Skip to main content

Security report for intra-el.lv

SIA Intra EL · Energy · Latvia

Partial score · DNS & email only

75/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

INTRA EL is a Latvian company specializing in the manufacturing, design, and installation of power and control electrical distribution cabinets. Established in 2004, it has grown to become the largest manufacturer of such cabinets in Latvia, with a strong international presence delivering projects in 18 countries. The company offers a comprehensive range of services including design, production, installation, programming, and 24/7 equipment servicing, targeting industrial clients, data centers, office buildings, and shopping centers. Their business model is B2B manufacturing and engineering services, supported by certifications such as ISO 9001 and partnerships with industry leaders like Schneider Electric. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins like Yoast SEO and Bootstrap for responsive design. The site loads moderately fast and is mobile optimized, though accessibility features are basic. SEO is well implemented with proper meta tags and structured data. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enforced but lacks security headers and explicit privacy or cookie policies. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is present. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be improved by adding security headers, privacy compliance documentation, and incident response contacts. The WHOIS data was unavailable due to query limits, which reduces trustworthiness assessment. The website content is professional, relevant, and safe for general audiences, with clear contact information and trust indicators. Strategically, the company should focus on enhancing privacy compliance, security best practices, and transparency to improve trust and meet regulatory requirements. Technical modernization and regular updates will help maintain security and performance.

Scanned

3 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

No critical or high findings. These medium findings are worth fixing next.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Medium

      No DKIM record found

      DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

      What to do: Configure DKIM with your email provider

    • Medium

      No MTA-STS Policy

      MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

      What to do: Implement MTA-STS to prevent downgrade attacks

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Medium

      SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

      SSL certificate expires in 38 days

      What to do: Plan SSL certificate renewal

    • Medium

      Mixed Content Detected

      2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

      What to do: Ensure all resources (images, scripts, stylesheets) are loaded over HTTPS

  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • Medium

      DNSSEC Not Enabled

      DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

      What to do: Enable DNSSEC to prevent DNS spoofing attacks

      • CAPEC-142
      • RFC 4033
      • RFC 4035

Keep watching intra-el.lv

This scan found 11 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
Average
83
After the cap
75

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention intra-el.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
22
Employees
0
Customers
0
Third parties
22
Weak passwords
9%

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for intra-el.lv.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

INTRA EL holds a strong market position as the leading electrical distribution cabinet manufacturer in Latvia with over 20 years of experience and international projects. Their competitive advantage lies in their comprehensive service offering, including design, manufacturing, programming, installation, and 24/7 servicing, supported by a skilled team of engineers and certifications like ISO 9001. The company targets industrial sectors such as manufacturing plants, data centers, office buildings, and shopping centers, providing tailored solutions to ensure operational continuity and safety. Their partnerships with global brands like Schneider Electric enhance their credibility and product quality. The business model is focused on B2B relationships with a medium-sized operational scale. Growth indicators include international project delivery and a broad product portfolio including White Label manufacturing. The company’s digital presence is professional but could benefit from enhanced privacy and security transparency.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options indicates room for improvement. There is no evidence of a published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure program, which are important for compliance and trust. The lack of privacy and cookie policies suggests GDPR compliance gaps. No vulnerable libraries or insecure forms were detected in the analyzed content. Overall, the security posture is functional but basic, with recommendations to implement security headers, privacy documentation, and incident response contacts to enhance protection and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to improve security posture.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and readiness.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure page or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA Intra EL
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA Intra EL
Description
Sadales skapju ražošana. INTRA-EL is a manufacturer and service provider specializing in power and control electrical distribution cabinets, with over 20 years of international experience and projects delivered in 18 countries.
Key services
Electrical distribution cabinet manufacturing, Automation and control cabinet production, White Label cabinet manufacturing, Design and engineering, Installation and commissioning, 24/7 equipment servicing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 5.5.15, Yoast SEO plugin, jQuery 3.4.1, GSAP 3.0.4, Bootstrap 4.5.1, Responsive Lightbox plugin
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by canonical URL https://)
  • No visible exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and images.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with phone, email, and physical address.
  4. No forms detected on the homepage or main content for data collection.
  5. Uses standard WordPress plugins and libraries with no obvious vulnerabilities.
  6. No security headers detected in provided data; recommend adding.
  7. No visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information.
  8. Social media presence limited to Facebook.
  9. Business is well presented with clear sector focus and certifications.
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 5.5.15 using a combination of modern libraries and plugins such as Yoast SEO for search optimization, Bootstrap 4.5.1 for responsive design, jQuery 3.4.1, and GSAP 3.0.4 for animations. The site loads with moderate performance and is mobile optimized with good navigation clarity. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is well implemented with meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data describing the organization and website. No hosting provider information was detected. The site lacks advanced security headers and privacy compliance features. There are no visible forms on the homepage, reducing attack surface but also limiting data collection. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with intra-el.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review intra-el.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.