Skip to main content

Security report for intimaclinic.pl

Intima Clinic · Healthcare · Poland

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Intima Clinic is a modern private medical clinic based in Kraków, Poland, specializing in gynecology, obstetrics, infertility treatment, aesthetic gynecology, urogynecology, physiotherapy, and endocrinology. The clinic offers over 50 medical procedures and consultations, targeting women seeking specialized healthcare services. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and provides clear navigation and comprehensive service information. It includes GDPR-compliant privacy and cookie policies with an opt-in consent mechanism, reflecting a strong commitment to user privacy and regulatory compliance. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern libraries and plugins such as Yoast SEO and WP Rocket, hosted by cyber_Folks S.A. Security posture is good with HTTPS enabled and no obvious vulnerabilities, though some security headers could be improved. No WAF or blocking mechanisms interfere with content access. WHOIS data confirms a stable domain registration since 2014, consistent with the business's operational history. Overall, the site demonstrates a mature digital presence with good security and privacy practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching intimaclinic.pl

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention intimaclinic.pl, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for intimaclinic.pl right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The clinic operates in the healthcare sector, focusing on women's health services including gynecology, obstetrics, and related specialties. Its business model is a private medical service provider with direct patient engagement via online registration and contact. The market position is that of a specialized, modern clinic in Kraków with a comprehensive service catalog. The website supports marketing and patient acquisition through SEO and Google Ads integration. No direct partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the data. The clinic appears to be a small-sized entity with a focused target audience. Trust signals include professional branding, structured data, and compliance with GDPR. The absence of explicit company registration or VAT information on the site is noted but common for small private clinics.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring encrypted communications. Security headers are not fully visible but HTTPS presence and cookie consent mechanisms indicate baseline security awareness. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The site uses minified assets and asynchronous loading for performance and security. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended improvement. No security.txt or incident response contacts are published, which could enhance transparency. Overall, the security posture is good but could be strengthened with additional headers and formal vulnerability disclosure policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and verify security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
  3. Publish a security.txt file to provide clear vulnerability disclosure and incident response contacts.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider adding explicit business registration and data protection officer contact information to enhance trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Intima Clinic
Description
Intima Clinic w Krakowie to nowoczesna prywatna placówka medyczna. W ofercie ponad 50 zabiegów i konsultacji. Rejestracja telefoniczna dostępna.
Key services
Gynecology, Obstetrics, Infertility diagnosis and treatment, Gynecological surgery, Aesthetic gynecology, Urogynecology, Physiotherapy, Endocrinology
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, WP Rocket, jQuery, Swiper.js, AOS (Animate On Scroll), GLightbox
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of minified CSS and JS
  • Google Tag Manager scripts loaded asynchronously

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional private medical clinic site focused on women's health.
  2. Content is comprehensive with detailed service listings.
  3. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented and GDPR compliant.
  4. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices.
  6. No security blocking or WAF challenges detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including Yoast SEO for search optimization, WP Rocket for caching and performance, and popular JavaScript libraries like Swiper and AOS for UI enhancements. The site loads assets asynchronously and uses minified CSS and JS to improve performance. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is well implemented with meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Hosting is provided by cyber_Folks S.A., a known Polish hosting provider. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in accessibility and security headers. No critical technical debt or risks were identified from the HTML content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with intimaclinic.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review intimaclinic.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.