Skip to main content

Security report for interway.cz

INTERWAY INSURANCE BROKERS, spol. s r.o. · Finance · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

INTERWAY INSURANCE BROKERS, spol. s r.o. is a Czech insurance brokerage company with over 20 years of experience, offering a range of insurance services including travel, vehicle, and employee insurance programs. The company operates under the parent group OK HOLDING, which is referenced throughout the website. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and provides clear contact information and service descriptions targeting both business clients and individuals seeking insurance solutions. Technically, the site uses modern tools such as Google Tag Manager and is built on simploCMS, ensuring a moderate level of digital maturity and performance. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and secure login forms; however, the absence of security headers and privacy policy documents indicates room for improvement. The lack of WHOIS data reduces domain trustworthiness, but the overall business credibility remains high due to consistent branding and transparent contact details. Strategic recommendations include publishing privacy and terms policies, enhancing security headers, and improving incident response transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching interway.cz

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
80
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a solid market position as a specialized insurance broker in the Czech Republic, leveraging its affiliation with OK HOLDING to enhance credibility and reach. Its business model focuses on brokerage services across multiple insurance sectors, targeting both corporate and individual clients. The website's content and linked domains suggest a well-integrated partnership ecosystem. Growth indicators include a professional online presence and active social media engagement via Instagram. Revenue streams likely derive from brokerage commissions and employee insurance programs. The company maintains a medium size profile with clear registration details and physical offices in Brno and Plzeň.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate. HTTPS is properly implemented, and login forms are designed to access multiple internal services securely. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options weakens the defense-in-depth strategy. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. Compliance gaps exist due to missing privacy and terms of service documentation, which are critical for GDPR adherence. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not publicly available, limiting transparency. Overall, the security culture appears basic but functional, with opportunities for enhancement in policy publication and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement and configure essential security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to strengthen security posture.
  3. Establish and publicize an incident response and vulnerability disclosure process to enhance transparency and readiness.
  4. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and tracking technologies to minimize security risks.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
INTERWAY INSURANCE BROKERS, spol. s r.o.
Registration number
C 87329
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
INTERWAY INSURANCE BROKERS, spol. s r.o.
Description
INTERWAY INSURANCE BROKERS, spol. s r. o. nabízí služby v oblasti pojištění všech odvětví hospodářství, občanské pojištění i zaměstnanecké programy.
Key services
Travel insurance, Vehicle insurance, Employee insurance programs
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, gtag.js, simploCMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure login forms with multiple login endpoints

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via gtag.js)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable, which is unusual and reduces domain trust.
  3. Website uses HTTPS and modern tracking technologies.
  4. No explicit privacy or terms of service pages found.
  5. Contact information is clearly presented in the footer.
  6. Website content is professional and consistent with an insurance brokerage.
  7. No security headers detected in provided data; opportunity for improvement.
  8. Cookie consent mechanism is present via third-party script.
  9. Social media presence limited to Instagram link.
  10. Multiple login forms target different internal services.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on simploCMS and leverages Google Tag Manager and gtag.js for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and uses modern HTML5 standards. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected in the provided content. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. The site uses HTTPS exclusively, ensuring encrypted communications. The cookie consent mechanism is implemented via a third-party script, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. Technical debt appears low, but the lack of security headers and privacy documentation suggests areas for modernization and compliance improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with interway.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review interway.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.