Skip to main content

Security report for intersolar.us

Intersolar & Energy Storage North America · Energy · N/a

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Intersolar & Energy Storage North America operates as a professional event organizer specializing in the solar and energy storage sectors. The company provides flagship and regional events designed to facilitate networking, exhibiting, and showcasing innovations within the renewable energy industry. Their market position is that of an established event platform serving industry professionals and businesses seeking to connect and grow within this niche. The website reflects a medium-sized business with a focused business model centered on event management and exhibition services. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Elementor framework, integrating multiple marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, Marketo, Hotjar, and Facebook Pixel. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, SEO practices, and moderate performance. Security measures include HTTPS enforcement, sandboxing of iframes, and a cookie consent mechanism via OneTrust, indicating a reasonable level of digital maturity. From a security perspective, the website benefits from strong SSL configuration and several security headers, contributing to a solid security posture. However, the absence of a publicly accessible privacy policy, terms of service, and incident response contacts represents compliance gaps. The lack of WHOIS data raises concerns about domain legitimacy, although the website's professional appearance and functionality mitigate some risk. Overall, the site scores well but should address privacy and transparency to improve trust. Strategically, the business should prioritize publishing comprehensive privacy and terms documents, disclose contact information for security incidents, and consider implementing a security.txt file to enhance vulnerability disclosure. These steps will strengthen compliance, user trust, and security readiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching intersolar.us

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
55
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets the renewable energy sector, specifically solar and energy storage markets, positioning itself as a key event organizer facilitating industry connections and business development. Their revenue streams likely derive from event registrations, exhibitor fees, and sponsorships. The presence of regional and flagship events indicates a growth-oriented strategy with geographic diversification. The company leverages digital marketing and analytics extensively to optimize outreach and engagement. Partnerships with marketing and ad networks enhance their promotional capabilities. The absence of direct contact details on the website may limit immediate customer engagement but does not detract from their established market presence. Overall, the business model is focused, with clear competitive advantages in event specialization and industry networking.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers implemented, reducing common web vulnerabilities. The use of sandbox attributes on iframes further mitigates risks from embedded content. The cookie consent mechanism aligns with privacy regulations, although the lack of a detailed privacy policy and incident response information indicates compliance gaps. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The absence of a security.txt file and explicit incident response contacts suggests limited readiness for vulnerability reporting and incident management. Enhancing transparency and formalizing security policies would improve the overall security culture and compliance stance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy detailing data collection, usage, and GDPR compliance.
  2. Add a terms of service page outlining user rights and obligations.
  3. Provide clear contact information including security incident response and abuse contacts.
  4. Implement a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure.
  5. Enhance website accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience.

Contact details published on the site

Registration number
Registration Now
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Intersolar & Energy Storage North America
Description
Intersolar & Energy Storage North America is an event platform focused on solar and energy storage industries, providing flagship and regional events for business networking, exhibiting, and exploring solar innovations.
Key services
Event registration, Exhibiting opportunities, Industry networking
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Google Tag Manager, Marketo, Hotjar, Facebook Pixel, Instagram Feed Plugin, OneTrust Cookie Consent
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Sandbox attribute applied to iframes
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Hotjar, Marketo, Facebook Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Divcom, Google Ads, ShareThis
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Marketo Munchkin, Twitter UWT
Marketing tools
Marketo, ShareThis
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional event platform focused on solar and energy storage industries.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual for a .com domain.
  3. Comprehensive use of marketing and analytics tools.
  4. Cookie consent is implemented via OneTrust.
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in the provided content.
  6. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the visible content.
  7. Website uses WordPress with Elementor and several plugins.
  8. No WAF or blocking detected; content fully accessible.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using the Elementor page builder, supported by a suite of marketing and analytics tools including Google Tag Manager, Marketo, Hotjar, and Facebook Pixel. The site employs multiple external scripts for tracking and advertising, indicating a sophisticated digital marketing infrastructure. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness and SEO optimization. The presence of OneTrust cookie consent scripts demonstrates attention to privacy compliance mechanisms. No hosting provider details were explicitly found, but the use of Amazon S3 for static assets suggests cloud hosting. The technical stack is current but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and privacy documentation to reduce technical debt and compliance risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with intersolar.us. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review intersolar.us.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.