Skip to main content

Security report for intersana.de

Intersana · Media · Germany

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Intersana operates a German-language health information website providing reliable guides and articles on healthy living and disease treatment. The site targets a general audience interested in health and wellness topics, positioning itself as a trusted media source within the German health information sector. The business model is primarily content publishing supported by advertising networks and consent management platforms. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript frameworks and integrates multiple third-party services for privacy compliance and advertising, including Usercentrics CMP, PD Privacy Service, CleverPush, Stroeer Ads, and Taboola. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices but lacks explicit CMS identification and hosting details. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS usage and consent management but lacks visible security headers, published security policies, or incident response information. No critical vulnerabilities or blocking mechanisms were detected. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but could improve transparency and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching intersana.de

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention intersana.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for intersana.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company Intersana is positioned as a medium-sized media entity focused on health-related content in Germany. It maintains subsidiaries such as wetter.intersana.de and messe.intersana.de, indicating a broader ecosystem. The site leverages advertising and tracking technologies to monetize content. The absence of explicit privacy and terms of service pages suggests areas for compliance improvement. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, and LinkedIn supports brand engagement. The business model relies on content quality and advertising revenue, targeting health-conscious consumers. Growth potential exists through enhanced compliance and security transparency.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS and integrates consent management platforms, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, the lack of security headers (e.g., CSP, HSTS) and absence of published security or incident response policies represent gaps in security maturity. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found, limiting transparency for security researchers. The use of multiple third-party scripts introduces potential risk vectors that require regular auditing. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by adopting best practices and publishing clear security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to enhance compliance and user trust.
  2. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Provide clear contact information for security incidents, including dedicated security or abuse email addresses.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and advertising integrations to minimize security risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Intersana
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Intersana
Description
intersana.de ist Ihr verlässlicher Gesundheit-Ratgeber mit hilfreichen Infos für ein gesundes Leben und zur Behandlung von Krankheiten.
Key services
health guides, disease treatment information, health news articles
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Usercentrics CMP, PD Privacy Service, CleverPush, Stroeer Ads, Taboola
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage (implied by canonical URL https://www.intersana.de/)
  • Consent management via Usercentrics and PD Privacy Service

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Stroeer, Taboola
Tracking pixels
Usercentrics, PD Privacy Service, CleverPush
Marketing tools
Usercentrics CMP, PD Privacy Service, CleverPush
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a German health information portal with multiple health-related articles.
  2. Uses multiple third-party advertising and consent management services.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  4. Contact information limited to postal address in structured data; no emails or phone numbers found.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  6. Good use of structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO and organization info.
  7. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; content fully accessible.
  8. Advertising practices rely on known ad networks and tracking services.
  9. Mobile optimization and responsive design present.
  10. No adult or NSFW content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website employs a modern JavaScript-based front end with asynchronous script loading and integration of multiple third-party services for privacy, advertising, and push notifications. The presence of Usercentrics CMP and PD Privacy Service indicates a focus on GDPR compliance. The site uses JSON-LD structured data extensively for SEO and organizational information. Performance is moderate with some lazy loading and deferred script execution. Mobile responsiveness is good, supported by media queries and font preloading. However, the CMS and hosting provider are not explicitly identified, and no advanced frameworks were detected. The technical infrastructure is adequate but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with intersana.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review intersana.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.