Skip to main content

Security report for inter-pflege.de

InterPflege Westfalen GmbH · Healthcare · Germany

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

InterPflege Westfalen GmbH is a small healthcare service provider specializing in ambulatory nursing and elderly care in Dortmund, Germany. Established in 2011, the company offers professional and individualized care services supported by a team of qualified nursing and social care professionals. The website reflects a local market position with clear communication channels and a focus on trust and professionalism. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Enfold theme, incorporating modern web technologies such as jQuery, Google Tag Manager, and Borlabs Cookie for GDPR-compliant cookie consent. Hosting is provided by Alfahosting, inferred from the nameservers. The site is mobile-optimized with moderate performance and good SEO practices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced, spam protection on forms, and cookie consent mechanisms. However, there is room for improvement by implementing security headers and publishing explicit security policies or vulnerability disclosure information. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious content were detected. Overall, the website demonstrates a trustworthy and professional online presence suitable for its healthcare service business. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, adding incident response information, and improving accessibility features to further strengthen compliance and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching inter-pflege.de

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
88
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

InterPflege Westfalen GmbH operates in the healthcare sector, focusing on ambulatory nursing and elderly care services in Dortmund and surrounding areas. The business model centers on providing professional care and social support to care-dependent individuals and their families. The company targets elderly and disabled clients requiring home care assistance. Market positioning is local and specialized, with a small company size and a founding year of 2011. The website content and structure support clear communication of services and career opportunities, indicating a stable operational presence. Partnerships include web design by ZENPRESS®. The company maintains a Facebook presence, enhancing community engagement. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented via Borlabs Cookie, ensuring GDPR compliance. Contact forms include CAPTCHA to mitigate spam. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options suggests potential areas for hardening. No explicit security policy or incident response contact information is published, which could be improved to enhance transparency and readiness. The WHOIS data aligns with the website content, supporting legitimacy. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from additional best practices and documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.
  5. Maintain regular updates of WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
InterPflege Westfalen GmbH
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
InterPflege Westfalen GmbH
Description
Ambulante Alten- und Krankenpflege in Dortmund, providing professional, efficient, and individualized care services since 2011.
Key services
Ambulante Krankenpflege, Altenpflege, Betreuung, Soziale Unterstützung
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 7.0.2, Enfold Theme 4.8.9.1, jQuery 3.7.1, Google Tag Manager, Borlabs Cookie Consent, Leaflet.js for maps
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with Borlabs Cookie plugin
  • Spam protection on contact form (captcha math question)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content rich.
  2. Clear contact information and multiple contact channels provided.
  3. Cookie consent implemented with detailed cookie categories.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and CMS.
  5. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  7. No terms of service page detected.
  8. Social media presence limited to Facebook.
  9. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and consistency.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by WordPress 7.0.2 with the Enfold theme version 4.8.9.1, leveraging jQuery 3.7.1 and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The Borlabs Cookie plugin manages cookie consent, supporting GDPR compliance. Leaflet.js is used for interactive maps. Hosting is provided by Alfahosting, as indicated by the nameservers. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices but shows moderate performance likely due to extensive CSS and JavaScript assets. No critical technical debt or deprecated technologies were identified. Opportunities exist to optimize performance and enhance security headers for improved resilience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with inter-pflege.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review inter-pflege.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.