Skip to main content

Security report for inter-oferta.pl

Towarzystwo Ubezpieczeń INTER Polska S.A. · Finance · Poland

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Towarzystwo Ubezpieczeń INTER Polska S.A. operates the inter-oferta.pl portal, providing a transactional platform for customers and insurance agents to access and purchase insurance offers online. The website targets Polish-speaking clients and insurance agents, facilitating secure login via email and access codes. The business is positioned as a medium-sized insurance provider with a clear focus on digital customer engagement. Technically, the website is built on the Liferay CMS platform, utilizing JavaScript, jQuery, and DWR for dynamic form handling. Google Analytics is employed for user tracking. The site is served over HTTPS with DNSSEC enabled, indicating a good baseline security posture. However, some modern security headers are missing, and mobile optimization is basic. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and input validation on login forms, but lacks explicit security policies and incident response contacts. Privacy compliance is well addressed with a clear privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. No vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and suitable for its business purpose. Strategic improvements in security headers, mobile accessibility, and transparency around terms of service and incident response would enhance its security posture and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching inter-oferta.pl

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
35
Email security
40
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the finance sector, specifically insurance, offering online transactional services for insurance policy purchase. Its market positioning is supported by a medium-sized footprint and a recognized brand in Poland. The business model relies on agent-mediated customer acquisition with digital self-service capabilities. Revenue streams likely include insurance premiums and agent commissions. The target customers are individual clients and insurance agents. The company maintains a partnership ecosystem with IT service providers and uses Google Analytics for marketing insights. Growth indicators include a domain age of 9 years and consistent branding. No subsidiaries or related domains were identified. Strategically, the company could expand digital offerings and improve mobile user experience to capture broader market segments and enhance customer satisfaction.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS and DNSSEC enabled, input validation on forms, and cookie consent mechanisms. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, which may delay response to security incidents. Data protection practices align with GDPR, supported by a comprehensive privacy policy. The use of Google Analytics introduces moderate user tracking, but privacy compliance is basic. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The security culture appears functional but could benefit from enhanced transparency and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish explicit terms of service and incident response policies to improve transparency and user trust.
  3. Enhance mobile optimization and accessibility to improve user experience across devices.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Regularly review and update privacy and cookie policies to maintain GDPR compliance and inform users about data retention.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Towarzystwo Ubezpieczeń INTER Polska S.A.
Registration number
KRS: 0000016204
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Towarzystwo Ubezpieczeń INTER Polska S.A.
Description
Portal Transakcyjny INTER umożliwia szybkie i proste zawarcie ubezpieczenia. Klienci mogą zapoznać się z ofertą po zalogowaniu się za pomocą adresu e-mail i kodu otrzymanego od agenta ubezpieczeniowego.
Key services
Oferta ubezpieczeń, Panel logowania dla klientów, Obsługa agentów ubezpieczeniowych
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery, DWR (Direct Web Remoting), Liferay Portal, Google Analytics
Frameworks
Liferay Portal
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • DNSSEC enabled
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • Input validation on login form

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional insurance portal for INTER Polska S.A.
  2. Content is in Polish with multi-language alternate links present.
  3. Login panel requires email and access code from insurance agents.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  5. No explicit terms of service found.
  6. No direct contact emails or phone numbers visible on main page; contact form implied via login panel.
  7. Google Analytics used for tracking.
  8. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy.
  9. No explicit security headers detected in HTML content.
  10. Site uses Liferay CMS and DWR for dynamic form processing.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Liferay CMS platform, leveraging JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and DWR for dynamic content and form processing. Google Analytics is integrated for visitor tracking. The site uses HTTPS with DNSSEC enabled, indicating a secure DNS and transport layer. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in mobile responsiveness and accessibility. The HTML structure is valid but lacks some modern SEO and security meta tags. Technical debt is minimal but could be reduced by updating legacy scripts and enhancing front-end optimization. Hosting provider details are not explicit, suggesting a need for clearer infrastructure documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with inter-oferta.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review inter-oferta.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.