Skip to main content

Security report for intellihealth.co

Intellihealth · Healthcare · United States

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FlyteHealth, operating under the legal name Intellihealth, is a healthcare company specializing in obesity care and chronic condition management. Their services combine medical care, coaching, and pharmacotherapy to empower individuals and businesses to achieve better health outcomes. The company targets employers, payers, PBMs, and individual patients, positioning itself as a clinically proven and cost-effective solution in the healthcare market. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and rich in relevant content, reflecting a mature digital presence. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using Elementor and integrates several modern tools including Yoast SEO, CleanTalk anti-spam, Pardot marketing automation, Hotjar analytics, and Google Analytics. The site demonstrates good SEO and accessibility practices, with a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR and CCPA. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses anti-spam measures and cookie consent banners. However, explicit security headers are missing, and no dedicated security or incident response policies are published. The absence of WHOIS registration data for the domain raises concerns about domain legitimacy and transparency, which impacts trustworthiness despite the professional appearance. Overall, FlyteHealth presents a credible healthcare service with strong business and technical foundations but should improve transparency around domain registration and enhance security policies to strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching intellihealth.co

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
85
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

FlyteHealth operates in the healthcare sector focusing on obesity and chronic care management. Its business model leverages partnerships with major payers and PBMs, offering clinical programs that optimize costs and improve patient outcomes. The company targets both business clients and individual consumers, indicating a B2B and B2C hybrid model. The presence of well-known partners like Kaiser Permanente and CVS Health suggests strong market positioning and credibility. The website content and branding are consistent and professional, supporting a medium-sized enterprise founded around 2020. Marketing efforts include podcasts, white papers, and downloadable resources, indicating active engagement with stakeholders. The partnership with joinflyte.com suggests a service ecosystem supporting patient engagement and care delivery.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and anti-spam protections are in place via CleanTalk. Cookie consent is managed with granular user controls, supporting privacy compliance. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options is a gap. No public security policy or incident response information is available, limiting transparency. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file reduces the site's readiness for coordinated vulnerability reporting. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be improved with better header implementation and published policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and user trust.
  3. Create and maintain a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party plugins and scripts to mitigate risks from vulnerable components.
  5. Enhance WHOIS domain registration transparency to improve legitimacy and trustworthiness perception.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Intellihealth
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Intellihealth
Description
Obesity care from FlyteHealth goes well beyond weight loss, giving you the power to achieve a lifetime of better health.
Key services
Obesity care programs, Chronic care management, GLP-1 cost optimization, Medical care, coaching, pharmacotherapy
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Yoast SEO, CleanTalk Anti-Spam, Cookie Law Info, Pardot, Hotjar, Google Analytics, jQuery, Elementor Pro
Frameworks
WordPress CMS, Elementor page builder
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Anti-spam plugin (CleanTalk)
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
CleanTalk Pixel, Hotjar
Marketing tools
Pardot, Hotjar
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design
  2. No WAF or security challenge blocking content
  3. WHOIS data unavailable, raising questions about domain registration status
  4. Strong healthcare industry focus with clear business model and target audience
  5. Good privacy and cookie compliance with consent mechanisms
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies found
  7. Use of modern WordPress technologies and SEO best practices
  8. Presence of tracking and analytics tools with moderate user tracking
  9. Contact information includes phone and contact form but no direct emails found
  10. Social media presence on major platforms
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using Elementor for page building, supported by Yoast SEO for search optimization and CleanTalk for anti-spam protection. Marketing automation is handled via Pardot, and user behavior analytics are collected through Google Analytics and Hotjar. The site is mobile responsive and accessible, with good SEO metadata and structured data (JSON-LD) for enhanced search engine understanding. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in caching and resource optimization. The technical stack is well integrated but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and more robust hosting transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with intellihealth.co. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review intellihealth.co.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.