Skip to main content

Security report for insurancecouncil.com.au

Insurance Council of Australia · Finance · Australia

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Insurance Council of Australia operates as the national representative body for the general insurance industry in Australia, focusing on advocacy, policy development, and industry research. The website targets industry stakeholders, government entities, and the public interested in insurance matters. The business model centers on providing a unified voice and resources for insurance companies in Australia, positioning itself as a key industry authority. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using Elementor and Yoast SEO plugins, with hosting and DNS services leveraging Cloudflare. The site demonstrates moderate performance and good mobile optimization, though accessibility features are basic. SEO practices are adequately implemented, supporting discoverability and user engagement. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with a good SSL configuration but lacks visible security headers and publicly available security policies or incident response information. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Privacy compliance is weak due to the absence of privacy and cookie policies or consent mechanisms. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and relevant to its industry, but it would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security best practices to improve user trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching insurancecouncil.com.au

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
80
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Insurance Council of Australia holds a strong market position as the leading industry association for general insurance in Australia. Its competitive advantage lies in its authoritative voice and comprehensive industry research. The business model is membership-based, serving insurance companies through advocacy and policy influence. Revenue streams likely include membership fees and industry services. The target customer segments include insurance companies, regulators, policymakers, and media. Growth indicators include active content updates and industry reports. The partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed but likely includes government and industry stakeholders. Strategic observations suggest a focus on maintaining industry standards and influencing regulatory frameworks.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and SSL properly configured. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces its defense-in-depth posture. No public incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies were found, indicating potential gaps in transparency and readiness. Data protection practices are unclear due to missing privacy policies. The site uses common third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager, which require careful management to avoid privacy risks. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be significantly improved by adopting standard security headers, publishing security policies, and implementing cookie consent mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance indicators.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection.
  3. Establish and disclose an incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Deploy a cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations and improve user trust.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks and ensure compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Insurance Council of Australia
Description
The Insurance Council of Australia is the representative body of the general insurance industry in Australia, providing advocacy, research, and policy development.
Key services
Industry advocacy, Policy development, Research and reports, Public information
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Google Fonts, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Easy Social Share Buttons for WordPress
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the provided content.
  3. Contact information such as emails or phone numbers not found in the provided HTML snippet.
  4. Website uses modern web technologies and SEO plugins.
  5. No security headers detected in the provided data; SSL is enabled.
  6. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information publicly available.
  7. Content is professional and relevant to insurance industry stakeholders.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform with Elementor page builder and Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a modern and widely supported technology stack. Hosting details are not explicit, but DNS is managed via Cloudflare, which can provide performance and security benefits. The site uses Google Fonts and Google Tag Manager for typography and analytics respectively. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness. Accessibility is basic, suggesting room for improvement in compliance with accessibility standards. SEO optimization is good, supported by meta tags and structured data. Technical risks include missing security headers and lack of DNSSEC, which could be addressed to improve security posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with insurancecouncil.com.au. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review insurancecouncil.com.au.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.