Skip to main content

Security report for inpg.cz

IN Publishing group s.r.o. · Media · Czech Republic

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

41/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

IN Publishing group s.r.o. is a Czech publishing company specializing in family and lifestyle magazines, including titles such as Moje rodina a já, ICE, and Moje Bydlení. The company targets a broad Czech readership, including young families and affluent clients, offering both print and digital magazine content. The website reflects a professional presence with clear navigation and relevant content showcasing their portfolio. Technically, the site uses legacy jQuery and Google Analytics for tracking, with moderate performance and basic mobile optimization. Security posture is average, with no visible security headers and use of an outdated JavaScript library posing potential risks. Privacy compliance is lacking, as no privacy or cookie policies are present. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the business claims, supporting legitimacy.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching inpg.cz

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
41

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a stable market position as a niche Czech publisher with a focused portfolio of family and lifestyle magazines. Their business model revolves around content publishing and advertising services targeting specific demographic segments. The website's integration with Google Analytics indicates an interest in user behavior analysis, though privacy compliance gaps exist. The absence of social media links or broader digital marketing tools suggests a traditional or limited digital marketing approach. The company appears small but established, with a domain age consistent with its founding date. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the data.

Security posture

The website's security posture is moderate but could be improved. The use of an outdated jQuery version (1.6.2) introduces potential vulnerabilities. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are recommended best practices. HTTPS usage is assumed but not explicitly confirmed in the data. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating non-compliance with GDPR requirements. No incident response or security contact information is provided. Overall, the site lacks advanced security measures and formal policies, which could expose it to risks and reduce user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Update all JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to current secure versions to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  2. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  3. Add standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  4. Verify and enforce HTTPS across the entire website to secure data transmission.
  5. Consider adding a dedicated security contact or incident response information to improve transparency and readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
IN Publishing group s.r.o.
Description
Vydavatelství IN publishing group s.r.o. je mladé dynamické, ryze české vydavatelství, jehož produkty se během krátké doby rozšířily do podvědomí většiny čtenářů České republiky. Portfolio společnosti tvoří časopisy Moje rodina a já, magazín ICE, Moje Bydlení, pravidelné speciály Těhotenství týden po týdnu, Vývoj dítěte od 0-3 let. Inzertním klientům nabízí portfolio možnost zasáhnout jak mladé, začínající rodiny, tak zavedenou luxusní klientelu.
Key services
časopisy Moje rodina a já, magazín ICE, časopis Moje Bydlení, speciály Těhotenství týden po týdnu, speciály Vývoj dítěte od 0-3 let, inzertní služby
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.6.2, Google Analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS assumed (not explicitly stated but Google Analytics uses HTTPS)
  • Outbound link tracking via Google Analytics event

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear navigation and relevant content.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Use of outdated jQuery version is a security concern.
  4. No visible forms or email addresses on the main page.
  5. Phone contact number is clearly displayed.
  6. Google Analytics is used for tracking, including outbound link clicks.
  7. No social media links detected.
  8. No security headers detected in provided data.
  9. WHOIS data is consistent and supports legitimacy.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses basic web technologies including jQuery 1.6.2 and Google Analytics for tracking. The HTML structure is valid with proper meta tags for SEO, but lacks modern frameworks or CMS indications. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. Hosting and domain registration are handled by REG-WEBGLOBE, consistent with the Czech market. The site could benefit from modernization of its tech stack and improved security configurations to reduce technical debt and enhance user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with inpg.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review inpg.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.