Skip to main content

Security report for inpart.io

Inpart · Healthcare · France

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Inpart is a specialized platform focused on facilitating science partnering within the biopharma, scientific, and academic sectors. The company positions itself as a trusted partner offering an end-to-end platform that enables connection, networking, and execution of deals among scientific decision-makers and research entities. The website demonstrates a professional and modern digital presence, leveraging advanced web technologies such as SvelteKit and integrating analytics tools like Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics. Structured data is well implemented to enhance SEO and business visibility. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data, but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies, which could be improved to strengthen trust and compliance. Privacy compliance indicators such as privacy and cookie policies are not found in the provided content, representing an area for enhancement. Overall, the website is well designed, accessible, and trustworthy, with a moderate to high security posture and a clear business focus on healthcare and technology sectors.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching inpart.io

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention inpart.io, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for inpart.io right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Inpart operates in the healthcare and technology sectors, targeting biopharma companies, academic researchers, and scientific institutions. Its business model revolves around providing a SaaS platform that streamlines scientific partnering activities, including connecting stakeholders, managing networks, and executing deals. The company claims a global vetted network with participation from top R&D-intensive firms and academic institutions, indicating a strong market position. The platform offers tailored solutions for various segments such as pharma, biotech, investors, and universities, suggesting diversified revenue streams. The website content and structured data reflect a small-sized company based in France, with no parent or subsidiary companies identified. The absence of explicit contact emails or phone numbers on the site may indicate a preference for controlled access via platform login or contact forms. The company’s digital maturity is evidenced by modern web technologies and SEO best practices, though privacy and security policy disclosures could be improved to align with industry standards.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good baseline security posture with enforced HTTPS and no visible exposure of sensitive information in the HTML content. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security robustness. No published security policies, incident response plans, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms were found, which are important for transparency and trust in the healthcare technology sector. The use of Google Tag Manager and Analytics introduces moderate user tracking, but privacy compliance disclosures are missing, which could pose compliance risks under GDPR and related regulations. No vulnerabilities or suspicious patterns were detected in the provided content. Recommendations include implementing security headers, publishing privacy and security policies, and establishing clear incident response and vulnerability disclosure channels to enhance security maturity and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Implement and disclose security policies and incident response procedures on the website.
  3. Add security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to improve security posture.
  4. Provide explicit contact emails for security, abuse, and incident reporting.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Inpart
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Inpart
Description
Inpart is the trusted partner for science partnering. We provide comprehensive solutions to facilitate, optimize and track interactions in the biopharma, scientific and academic sectors.
Key services
Connect, Network, Execute, Academic faculty & lab solutions, Pharma solutions, Investor solutions, Biotech solutions, University/Institute solutions, Other industry sectors solutions
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
SvelteKit, JavaScript, SVG graphics, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics
Frameworks
SvelteKit
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics via Google Tag Manager
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found in the provided HTML
  3. WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy or query failure
  4. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found in HTML
  5. Strong use of structured data for SEO and business information
  6. Use of Google Tag Manager and Analytics for tracking
  7. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms
  8. No security policy or incident response information published
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies, primarily SvelteKit, which supports fast and reactive user experiences. The use of SVG graphics and modular CSS indicates attention to design and performance. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are integrated for tracking and marketing insights. The site appears mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices including structured data (JSON-LD) for organization, services, and webpage metadata. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected from the HTML content. Performance is moderate, likely due to rich graphics and scripts, but overall user experience is smooth. Technical risks include missing security headers and lack of explicit privacy and security disclosures, which could impact compliance and trust. Opportunities exist to enhance technical robustness by adding these missing elements and improving transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with inpart.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review inpart.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.