Skip to main content

Security report for inourhands.ca

Stratford General Hospital Foundation · Healthcare · Canada

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Stratford General Hospital Foundation is a well-established non-profit organization focused on fundraising for healthcare equipment and infrastructure in Stratford, Ontario. The website highlights a successful capital campaign exceeding $30 million, emphasizing community involvement and donor recognition. The foundation positions itself as a critical partner in bridging funding gaps not covered by provincial healthcare budgets. Technically, the website uses a combination of Bootstrap, jQuery, and other JavaScript libraries, with hosting and DNS services supported by Cloudflare. While the site is generally well-structured and mobile-optimized, some outdated libraries and missing security headers present moderate security concerns. Privacy and cookie policies are present but basic, with no visible terms of service or incident response policies. Overall, the site demonstrates strong business credibility and community trust but could improve its security posture and privacy compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching inourhands.ca

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
50
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The foundation operates in the healthcare and non-profit sectors, targeting local community members, donors, and healthcare stakeholders. Its competitive advantage lies in strong community engagement and a history of successful fundraising campaigns. Revenue streams are primarily donations and philanthropic gifts. The organization maintains a visible partnership ecosystem through social media and local community groups. Growth indicators include surpassing ambitious fundraising goals and expanding healthcare infrastructure. Strategic observations suggest a focus on donor relations and capital campaign transparency to sustain long-term support.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protections in place. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers, and use of an outdated jQuery version introduce vulnerabilities that could be exploited. There is no public security policy or incident response contact information, which limits transparency and preparedness. Compliance with GDPR is minimal, primarily through a cookie consent banner. The site would benefit from enhanced security controls, regular vulnerability assessments, and clearer data protection disclosures to align with best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to secure DNS queries and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Upgrade jQuery and other JavaScript libraries to current supported versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  4. Develop and publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response contact information.
  5. Enhance privacy compliance by expanding the privacy policy to address GDPR and data retention practices.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Stratford General Hospital Foundation
Description
Stratford General Hospital Foundation Medical Equipment Fundraising Charity Stratford Ontario
Key services
Capital fundraising campaigns, Donor engagement and recognition, Healthcare equipment and infrastructure funding
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.11.2, Bootstrap CSS and JS, Swiper.js for banners, SimpleLightbox.js for gallery, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited and clientUpdateProhibited domain statuses

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a well-maintained non-profit healthcare foundation site
  2. Content is rich and focused on fundraising campaign success and donor engagement
  3. Use of modern front-end libraries but some outdated scripts (jQuery 1.11.2)
  4. No visible security policy or incident response information
  5. Privacy and cookie policies are present but basic
  6. No terms of service found
  7. Contact information is clear and includes email, phone, and physical address
  8. Social media presence is strong with multiple platforms linked
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a traditional web stack using Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery for DOM manipulation. It leverages Swiper.js for interactive banners and SimpleLightbox for image galleries. The CMS is REM Web Solutions' WebWiz@rd 4.X, indicating a proprietary or specialized platform. Hosting details are not explicit but DNS is managed via Cloudflare, providing some security and performance benefits. Performance is moderate with room for optimization, especially considering the use of older JavaScript libraries. Accessibility features are basic, and SEO is adequately addressed through meta tags and structured data. Technical debt is present due to outdated libraries and missing security enhancements, which should be addressed to reduce operational risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with inourhands.ca. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review inourhands.ca.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.