Skip to main content

Security report for innotech.at

INNOTECH Arbeitsschutz GmbH · Energy · Austria

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

INNOTECH Arbeitsschutz GmbH is a leading Austrian manufacturer specializing in fall protection systems and safety equipment across Europe. The company offers a comprehensive range of products including rope, rail, and railing safety systems, complemented by planning, installation, maintenance, and training services. Their market position is strong within the industrial safety and energy sectors, targeting professional clients requiring reliable safety solutions. Technically, the website is built on TYPO3 CMS with integrations for analytics and marketing via Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot, and Cookiebot, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforcement and cookie consent mechanisms, though additional security headers and explicit security policies could enhance protection. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust assessment, but the professional presentation and GDPR compliance indicate a legitimate and trustworthy business. Strategic recommendations include improving security headers, publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy, and verifying domain registration details to strengthen trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
48/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching innotech.at

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
78
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
48
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

INNOTECH operates in a niche market of fall protection and industrial safety, leveraging a manufacturing and service business model. Their competitive advantage lies in tailored safety solutions and comprehensive training services, supported by a strong European presence. The company engages customers through detailed product finders, educational content, and direct contact options. Partnerships, such as with Paul Bauder GmbH, enhance their market reach. The website's multilingual support and professional branding indicate a focus on growth and customer engagement. Revenue streams likely include product sales, service contracts, and training programs. The company maintains a medium-sized operational scale with consistent branding and high content quality.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, aligning with GDPR requirements. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the lack of advanced security headers like Content-Security-Policy and absence of a published security or incident response policy represent areas for improvement. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms were found, which could hinder responsible vulnerability reporting. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not explicitly visible. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from enhanced transparency and additional technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  2. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Verify and publish domain WHOIS information to enhance trust and legitimacy.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
INNOTECH Arbeitsschutz GmbH
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
INNOTECH Arbeitsschutz GmbH
Description
Führender Hersteller von Absturzsicherungen in Europa mit maßgeschneiderten Systemen für Seilsicherung, Schienensicherung, Geländersicherung und mehr.
Key services
Fall protection product manufacturing, Planning and consulting services, Installation and maintenance, Training and webinars
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
TYPO3 CMS, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, FontAwesome, Feather Carousel
Frameworks
TYPO3 CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure forms with HubSpot integration

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
HubSpot Forms, Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented in German targeting Austrian and European markets.
  3. Strong focus on fall protection products and related services.
  4. Use of modern CMS (TYPO3) and integration with marketing and analytics tools.
  5. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  6. Contact information is available via forms and physical address.
  7. No security.txt or explicit security policy found.
  8. WHOIS data is missing, limiting domain trust assessment.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by TYPO3 CMS, a robust and scalable content management system suitable for enterprise use. Integration with Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and HubSpot indicates a well-established marketing and analytics infrastructure. Cookiebot is used for cookie consent management, supporting GDPR compliance. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization in loading speed. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, though hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional and user-friendly experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 31/100High28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with innotech.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review innotech.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.