Skip to main content

Security report for inkasso.de

Bundesverband Deutscher Inkasso-Unternehmen e.V. · Finance · Germany

High risk. 12 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

38/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Bundesverband Deutscher Inkasso-Unternehmen e.V. (BDIU) operates as the leading industry association for debt collection companies in Germany. The website inkasso.de serves as a comprehensive platform providing information about the association's advocacy role, services for consumers, and member resources. The site targets both businesses in the debt collection sector and consumers seeking information about debt collection processes. BDIU holds a significant market position, representing approximately 70% of active debt collection companies in Germany, and offers key services including advocacy, consumer protection, and education through its affiliated Inkassoakademie. Technically, the website is built on the TYPO3 CMS platform, leveraging modern web technologies such as jQuery and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices, with a moderate performance profile. The presence of a cookie consent mechanism and a comprehensive privacy policy indicates a strong commitment to privacy compliance. However, some areas such as explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not publicly documented. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent, but lacks visible security headers and a published security policy. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The WHOIS data is limited but does not raise concerns, supporting the legitimacy of the domain. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy front for the association, with room for improvement in security transparency and incident response readiness. Strategically, the BDIU website effectively supports its role as an industry leader and consumer advocate. Enhancing security disclosures and providing clearer incident response channels would strengthen trust and compliance posture. Continued investment in technical modernization and privacy practices will support sus…

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

12 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: SMB

      Port 445 (SMB) is publicly accessible - SMB - Windows file sharing, high risk

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to SMB using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching inkasso.de

This scan found 31 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
37
Security headers
25
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
28
Average
38

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

BDIU holds a dominant position in the German debt collection industry as a representative association. Its business model centers on advocacy, member services, and consumer education, supported by partnerships with recognized organizations. The association's revenue streams likely include membership fees and educational services. The target customers include debt collection companies, businesses requiring debt recovery services, and consumers seeking information or assistance. Growth indicators include a stable member base of approximately 450 companies and significant market coverage. The partnership ecosystem is robust, including affiliations with European and national industry bodies. Operationally, BDIU maintains a professional digital presence with clear branding and informative content, reinforcing its market leadership.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and cookie consent mechanisms are in place, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of a published security policy or incident response contact reduce the overall security posture. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were detected. The site does not provide a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure program, which are recommended best practices. The security culture appears focused on privacy compliance but could benefit from enhanced transparency and proactive incident management capabilities.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Implement and advertise an incident response contact email (e.g., security@ or abuse@) for vulnerability reporting.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to improve protection against common web attacks.
  4. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced.
  5. Enhance transparency by providing a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure guidelines.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Bundesverband Deutscher Inkasso-Unternehmen e.V.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bundesverband Deutscher Inkasso-Unternehmen e.V.
Description
BDIU is the industry association for debt collection companies in Germany, acting as a partner to the economy and intermediary between the public and politics, providing services for consumers.
Key services
Advocacy and representation, Consumer information and protection, Member services and networking, Education and training via Inkassoakademie
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
TYPO3 CMS, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Curator.io embed
Frameworks
TYPO3 CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in German and targets the debt collection industry and consumers in Germany.
  3. Strong presence of industry association branding and statistics.
  4. Cookie consent is implemented with clear user options.
  5. No contact email addresses explicitly found in the HTML content; phone number and physical address are present.
  6. No visible forms collecting personal data on the homepage or main content.
  7. Use of modern CMS TYPO3 and integration of Google Tag Manager for analytics.
  8. Social media presence includes Xing, LinkedIn, and Instagram.
  9. No explicit security policy or incident response contact found.
  10. No terms of service page detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on TYPO3 CMS, a mature and widely used content management system, indicating a stable technical foundation. The integration of Google Tag Manager and curator.io scripts supports analytics and content curation needs. The site uses responsive design techniques for good mobile optimization and includes appropriate meta tags for SEO. Performance is moderate, with no critical issues detected. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from additional security hardening measures. No hosting provider details were identified from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs effectively with opportunities for modernization and enhanced security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with inkasso.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review inkasso.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.