Skip to main content

Security report for inhousepharmacy.vu

Pacific Health Ltd · Healthcare · Vanuatu

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Inhouse Pharmacy, operated by Pacific Health Ltd, is a reputable online pharmacy established since 1996, specializing in shipping authentic prescription medications worldwide from a South Pacific facility. The company emphasizes affordable pricing, authentic sourcing from government-registered and FDA-approved manufacturers, and excellent customer service supported by licensed pharmacists. Their market position is strong within the online pharmacy sector, targeting individuals seeking safe and affordable medications globally. Technically, the website is built on ASP.NET WebForms with modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and integrates multiple analytics and tracking tools including Microsoft Clarity, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook SDK. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO and accessibility basics, though there is room for improvement in security headers and accessibility compliance. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and use of Trustwave security seals, but lacks explicit security policies or incident response contacts. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the website presents a professional, trustworthy, and user-friendly platform with moderate technical sophistication and a good security baseline. The absence of WHOIS data reduces transparency but is common in this sector. Strategic recommendations include enhancing HTTP security headers, publishing security policies, and improving accessibility standards.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching inhousepharmacy.vu

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
90
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention inhousepharmacy.vu, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1,554
Employees
0
Customers
1,554
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
18%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for inhousepharmacy.vu.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Inhouse Pharmacy operates as a medium-sized healthcare e-commerce business with a long-standing market presence since 1996. Their competitive advantage lies in authentic medication sourcing, global shipping capabilities, and strong customer service. Revenue streams are primarily from online prescription medication sales. The target customer segment includes individuals worldwide seeking affordable and reliable pharmacy services. The company maintains a partnership ecosystem with FDA-approved manufacturers and uses trusted third-party analytics and security services. Growth indicators include active customer testimonials and ongoing marketing efforts. The business operates transparently with clear contact channels and regulatory compliance claims.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, secure form handling, and use of recognized security seals (Trustwave). However, it lacks comprehensive security policies and incident response information publicly available. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. The use of multiple third-party tracking scripts introduces moderate risk, mitigated by cookie consent mechanisms. Compliance with GDPR is indicated by privacy and cookie policies. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not explicitly documented, suggesting an area for improvement.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and customer trust.
  3. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate supply chain risks.
  4. Enhance website accessibility to meet WCAG standards for broader user inclusivity.
  5. Consider publishing a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Pacific Health Ltd
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Pacific Health Ltd
Description
Inhouse Pharmacy ships authentic brand-name and generic prescription medications worldwide from a regulated online pharmacy operating since 1996. They provide affordable prescription drugs sourced from government-registered manufacturers and FDA-approved facilities.
Key services
Prescription medication sales, Worldwide shipping, Customer service support, Consultation with licensed pharmacists
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.7.1, jQuery UI 1.13.2, jQuery Validate 1.19.5, ScrollReveal, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft ASP.NET WebForms
Frameworks
ASP.NET WebForms
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure forms with validation
  • Use of Trustwave security seal

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity, Google Analytics (via GTM), Facebook Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Facebook SDK
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
  2. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
  3. WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating privacy protection or registry restrictions
  4. Business is well presented with clear contact info and customer testimonials
  5. Use of multiple tracking and analytics services with cookie consent implemented
  6. Security best practices partially implemented but could improve HTTP headers
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published
  8. Content is safe and appropriate for general audiences
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a legacy ASP.NET WebForms framework supplemented with modern JavaScript libraries including jQuery and jQuery UI. It integrates advanced analytics tools such as Microsoft Clarity and Google Tag Manager, indicating a focus on user behavior analysis and marketing optimization. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness and SEO practices. The site uses server-side form validation and client-side enhancements. Technical debt is present due to the older framework but is managed with modern front-end tooling. Opportunities exist to modernize the backend and improve accessibility and security headers to reduce technical risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with inhousepharmacy.vu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review inhousepharmacy.vu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.