Skip to main content

Security report for inhofer.de

Möbel Inhofer GmbH & Co KG · Retail · Germany

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Möbel Inhofer GmbH & Co KG operates a large-scale retail website specializing in furniture and home accessories, positioning itself as Europe's largest living world for these products. The website targets a broad general audience interested in furniture trends and home decoration, offering a vast inventory and services such as delivery and purchase on account. The company is based in Germany and presents a professional and consistent brand image online. Technically, the website leverages modern e-commerce technologies, including Shopware CMS, Google Tag Manager, Bing UET, Facebook Pixel, and Usercentrics for consent management. The site is mobile-optimized and integrates extensive accessibility features, demonstrating a commitment to inclusive user experience. Performance is moderate with good SEO and accessibility practices. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and employs consent management to comply with privacy regulations. However, explicit security headers and policies are not evident, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published. The WHOIS data shows active domain registration but limited registrant details, which slightly reduces trust confidence. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and accessible, with room for improvement in privacy policy transparency and security policy publication. No critical security issues or content safety concerns were detected.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching inhofer.de

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
65
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Möbel Inhofer holds a strong market position in the retail furniture sector in Europe, emphasizing a large product catalog and immediate availability. The business model focuses on direct sales with delivery and flexible payment options. The company targets general consumers seeking furniture and home accessories. The website's integration of multiple languages in accessibility tools suggests a diverse customer base. The use of advanced marketing and tracking tools indicates a mature digital marketing strategy. No direct partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the data provided.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS enforcement and cookie consent management via Usercentrics. Tracking and advertising scripts are managed with default denied consent states, enhancing privacy. However, the absence of explicit security headers (e.g., CSP, HSTS) and lack of published security policies or incident response contacts indicate areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The security score is moderate, reflecting good practices but missing advanced security measures and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to enhance compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options to strengthen security posture.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Maintain and regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking technologies to minimize privacy risks and ensure compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Möbel Inhofer GmbH & Co KG
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Möbel Inhofer GmbH & Co KG
Description
Möbel & Wohnaccessoires Europas größte Wohnwelt entdecken! 500.000 Artikel bevorratet. Möbeltrends sofort zum Mitnehmen! Lieferservice - Kauf auf Rechnung.
Key services
Furniture sales, Home accessories, Delivery service, Purchase on account
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Bing UET Tag, Facebook Pixel, Usercentrics Consent Management, JavaScript, CSS, SVG
Frameworks
Shopware (implied by swagcmsextensions references)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
excellent
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Consent management for cookies and tracking
  • Ad data redaction enabled by default

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM implied)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook Ads, Bing Ads, Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Bing UET
Marketing tools
Usercentrics Consent Management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Strong focus on accessibility with an extensive accessibility tool integrated.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found in the provided content.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented via Usercentrics.
  5. No contact forms detected in the provided HTML snippet.
  6. Company contact phone number and address found in JSON-LD structured data.
  7. Multiple languages supported in accessibility tool but main site language is German.
  8. Use of modern tracking and marketing technologies.
  9. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Shopware CMS platform, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries and tracking technologies including Google Tag Manager, Bing UET, and Facebook Pixel. Usercentrics is used for consent management, indicating GDPR awareness. The site includes extensive accessibility features, including a dedicated accessibility tool with multiple profiles and customization options. Performance is moderate, with deferred script loading and responsive design. The technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced security headers and more explicit privacy documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with inhofer.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review inhofer.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.