Skip to main content

Security report for infusionaccessfoundation.org

Infusion Access Foundation · Healthcare · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Infusion Access Foundation is a small nonprofit organization dedicated to advocating for patients requiring provider-administered infusion and injection treatments. The organization focuses on community support, education, and policy advocacy to improve access to therapies for chronic disease patients. Their website is professionally designed with rich patient stories and resources, targeting patients, advocates, and policymakers. Technically, the site uses modern frameworks including React and WordPress as a headless CMS, supported by Firebase and Zoho for backend services and marketing. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly, though it lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, which is a compliance gap. Security posture is good with HTTPS and no exposed sensitive data, but could be improved by enabling DNSSEC and adding security headers. Overall, the website is trustworthy and well-positioned within its niche, but should enhance privacy compliance and incident response transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching infusionaccessfoundation.org

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Infusion Access Foundation operates in the healthcare non-profit sector, focusing on patient advocacy for infusion therapies. Their business model centers on community engagement, education, and advocacy rather than commercial revenue. The organization leverages patient stories and events to build awareness and influence policy. Their partnership ecosystem includes related domains for content management and service tools like infusion center locators. The foundation's market position is niche but important, serving a specialized patient community with unmet needs. Growth indicators include active social media presence and ongoing content updates. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to expand transparency and compliance to strengthen stakeholder trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data leaks. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents areas for improvement. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are provided, limiting transparency. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager and Zoho Campaigns introduces moderate tracking but no apparent vulnerabilities. Compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the security maturity is good but can be enhanced by adopting best practices and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Implement a cookie consent mechanism to inform users about tracking.
  3. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security.
  5. Provide clear incident response and vulnerability disclosure contacts and policies.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Infusion Access Foundation
Description
Infusion Access Foundation is a community of patients and advocates united to protect access to provider-administered treatments, such as infusions and injections. They support patients across all diseases and advocate with one voice to policy makers. As a 501(c)(3) nonprofit, their mission is to expand access to provider-administered therapies and help patients live their best, healthiest lives.
Key services
Patient advocacy, Education and resources, Community support, Infusion center locator, Patient stories and awareness, Advocacy events and campaigns
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Firebase, WordPress (headless CMS), Tailwind CSS, Zoho Campaigns, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
React, Remix
Platforms
Firebase, WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of modern frameworks and libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Zoho Campaigns
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally designed nonprofit focused on patient advocacy for infusion treatments.
  2. Content is rich with patient stories, resources, and advocacy information.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the homepage or footer.
  5. Social media presence is strong with official accounts on Facebook, LinkedIn, Instagram, Twitter, and YouTube.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks indicates good technical maturity.
  7. Security posture is good but can be improved with additional headers and DNSSEC.
  8. No signs of malicious or suspicious content or domains.
  9. No forms with personal data collection detected on the homepage content provided.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including React with Remix framework, Tailwind CSS for styling, and WordPress as a headless CMS. Firebase services support backend infrastructure including database and authentication. Marketing and tracking are handled via Zoho Campaigns and Google Tag Manager. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata. Performance is moderate, likely due to multiple external scripts and rich media content. No technical debt or deprecated libraries were detected. Opportunities exist to optimize loading speed and enhance security configurations. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable web presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with infusionaccessfoundation.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review infusionaccessfoundation.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.