Skip to main content

Security report for infrontfinance.com

Infront · Finance · N/a

Medium risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Infront is a well-established provider of market data and trading software solutions, serving wealth management and trading professionals globally. The company positions itself as an industry leader with over 35 years of experience, trusted by thousands of businesses and professional users. Their offerings include WealthTech solutions, APIs, data feeds, risk management, and analytics, supported by a strong client base and recognized certifications such as the Swiss EAM Award and EcoVadis ESG rating. Technically, the website is built on Adobe Experience Manager and integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. However, the site suffers from a critical security issue due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of modern TLS protocols, which significantly impacts its security posture. Privacy compliance is well managed with Cookiebot consent mechanisms and a comprehensive privacy policy. Overall, while the business and content quality are excellent, the security weaknesses and slow performance present risks that should be addressed promptly.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching infrontfinance.com

This scan found 13 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
80
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Infront operates in the finance sector, focusing on delivering tailored market data and trading software solutions to wealth managers, brokers, and financial institutions. Their business model is B2B SaaS and data feed provision, with a strong emphasis on compliance, usability, and cost-effectiveness. The company leverages partnerships and integrations with major platforms like Adobe, Marketo, and Microsoft Azure. Their client portfolio includes major banks and financial firms, enhancing their market credibility. The presence of a whistleblower portal and detailed cookie consent indicates a mature approach to governance and compliance. Growth indicators include recent press releases and events promoting new product launches and roadmap updates. The company maintains a consistent brand image and professional digital presence, supporting its market position.

Security posture

The website's security posture is currently weak due to the lack of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols, exposing users to potential data interception and man-in-the-middle attacks. The absence of security headers further reduces protection against common web vulnerabilities. While SPF and DMARC records are properly configured, indicating good email security practices, the overall web security configuration is insufficient. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies were found, which could hinder timely handling of security incidents. The use of multiple third-party tracking and marketing scripts increases the attack surface and privacy risks. Immediate remediation of SSL/TLS issues and implementation of security headers are critical to improve the security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS and secure user communications.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3) and disable insecure legacy protocols.
  3. Implement essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response plan to enhance security transparency and readiness.
  5. Audit and minimize third-party scripts to reduce privacy risks and improve performance.
  6. Optimize website performance to reduce load times and improve user experience.
  7. Enhance contact information visibility with direct company emails and phone numbers for better user trust.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Adobe Experience Manager, leveraging Adobe Launch and Marketo for marketing automation, along with multiple analytics and tracking services. Hosting is via Microsoft Azure DNS infrastructure. The site is multilingual and mobile-optimized with good accessibility and SEO practices. However, the page load time is slow with a large page size and many resources, indicating potential technical debt or unoptimized assets. The lack of SSL/TLS and security headers represents a significant technical risk. The technology stack is modern but requires security hardening and performance tuning to meet enterprise standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with infrontfinance.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review infrontfinance.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.