Skip to main content

Security report for infront.co

Infront · Finance · N/a

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Infront is a well-established company specializing in WealthTech solutions, market data, and trading software tailored for wealth management and brokerage professionals. The company positions itself as an industry leader with over 35 years of experience, serving a broad client base including financial institutions and professional users. Their offerings include advanced trading connectivity, portfolio management, APIs, risk services, and data analytics, supported by a strong digital presence and client trust signals such as awards and prominent client logos. Technically, the website is built on Adobe Experience Manager, hosted likely on Microsoft Azure infrastructure, and employs modern web technologies including TLS 1.3, Adobe Analytics, Marketo, and Cookiebot for consent management. The site demonstrates good performance, mobile optimization, and accessibility standards, with comprehensive SEO and structured data implementations. From a security perspective, the site uses strong SSL configurations, implements SPF and DMARC for email security, and has no detected vulnerabilities such as Heartbleed or Logjam. However, improvements can be made by enabling HSTS, DNSSEC, and CAA records. Privacy compliance is robust with clear cookie consent mechanisms and a comprehensive privacy policy aligned with GDPR requirements. Overall, Infront's website reflects a mature digital and security posture suitable for its finance industry clientele, with extensive tracking and marketing tools balanced by strong privacy controls. The risk level is low, but strategic enhancements in DNS security and public security policies could further strengthen trust and resilience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching infront.co

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
97
Security headers
80
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Infront operates in the finance sector, focusing on delivering market data and trading software solutions primarily for wealth management and brokerage industries. Their business model is B2B, offering SaaS and data feed services that are customizable and cost-effective. The company targets professional users, portfolio managers, digital transformation managers, and family offices, emphasizing compliance and security. Their market position is strong, supported by over 3500 business clients and 70,000 professional users daily. Strategic partnerships and client endorsements, including major banks and financial institutions, reinforce their credibility. The company actively promotes events and publishes news and reports, indicating a growth-oriented and engaged market presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security posture with HTTPS enforced via modern TLS protocols and strong cipher suites. Email security is addressed through SPF and DMARC records, reducing phishing risks. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The absence of DNSSEC and CAA records represents a moderate security gap that could be exploited in DNS spoofing or unauthorized certificate issuance. The site uses Cookiebot for consent management, aligning with privacy regulations. However, no explicit public security or incident response policies were found, which could enhance transparency and preparedness. Overall, the security maturity is good, with room for improvement in DNS security and public disclosure of security practices.

Recommendations

  1. Enable HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload to enforce HTTPS and prevent downgrade attacks.
  2. Implement DNSSEC to protect against DNS spoofing and ensure DNS integrity.
  3. Add Certification Authority Authorization (CAA) DNS records to restrict which CAs can issue certificates for the domain.
  4. Publish a security.txt file to provide a clear vulnerability disclosure policy and contact information for security issues.
  5. Develop and publicly share incident response and security policies to enhance trust and demonstrate security governance.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Adobe Experience Manager, a robust enterprise CMS, and hosted likely on Microsoft Azure infrastructure. It uses a modern tech stack including TLS 1.3, Adobe Analytics, Marketo for marketing automation, and Cookiebot for GDPR-compliant cookie consent. Performance is moderate with a page load time of approximately 6.4 seconds and a page size of about 700KB, which is acceptable for a content-rich site. The site is mobile optimized and accessible, with clear navigation and structured data for SEO. The use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools indicates a mature digital marketing strategy but requires careful privacy management. Technical risks are low, with opportunities to improve DNS security and reduce external dependencies where possible.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with infront.co. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review infront.co.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.