Skip to main content

Security report for infraserv.com

Infraserv Höchst · Energy · Germany

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Infraserv Höchst is a leading industrial site management and service provider specializing in the chemical and pharmaceutical sectors in Germany. The company operates the Industriepark Höchst and offers a broad portfolio of services including site management, energy supply, waste disposal, logistics, occupational safety, environmental protection, facility management, laboratory services, process technology, and education. Their market position is strong as a key infrastructure and service provider for chemical and pharma industries, supported by a large workforce and extensive client references. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including Usercentrics for consent management, FriendlyCaptcha for bot protection, and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and provides comprehensive content with clear navigation. Privacy compliance is robust with GDPR-aligned policies and cookie consent mechanisms. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and consent management in place, though explicit security headers and a published security policy or incident response contacts are absent. No critical vulnerabilities were detected in the visible content. However, the WHOIS data for the domain is missing, which raises some concerns about domain registration transparency. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy front for a large industrial services company, but the lack of WHOIS data and explicit security policies suggests areas for improvement in transparency and security communication.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching infraserv.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
50
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Infraserv Höchst operates primarily in the energy and manufacturing sectors, focusing on site services for chemical and pharmaceutical industries. Their business model revolves around providing integrated infrastructure and operational services to industrial clients, enhancing efficiency and compliance. The company has a large employee base and extensive partnerships, including the Industriepark Höchst and logistics providers. Their growth is supported by innovation projects in sustainability and technology. The website reflects a mature digital presence with strong branding and comprehensive service descriptions, targeting industrial customers and partners.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and use of a consent management platform. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces the overall security posture. No dedicated security policy or incident response contact information is published, which is a gap in transparency and readiness. The use of FriendlyCaptcha indicates bot mitigation efforts. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analyzed content. The missing WHOIS data is a concern for domain legitimacy verification.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and provide incident response contact details to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data issue to ensure domain registration transparency and legitimacy.
  4. Continue to maintain and update privacy and cookie consent mechanisms to comply with evolving regulations.
  5. Consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Infraserv Höchst
Description
Infraserv Höchst betreibt Standorte für Chemie und Pharma zur Optimierung der Sekundärprozesse im Bereich Site Services, Energien, Entsorgung, Logistik.
Key services
Standortmanagement, Energien, Entsorgung, Logistik, Arbeitsschutz, Betriebliches Gesundheitsmanagement, Umweltschutz, Facility Management, Labor, Prozesstechnik
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Usercentrics CMP, FriendlyCaptcha, Google Tag Manager, Slick Carousel
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Consent management platform in use
  • Captcha for forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Usercentrics Consent Management Platform
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation.
  2. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms.
  3. Professional and comprehensive service offerings in industrial site management.
  4. Strong privacy and cookie consent mechanisms implemented.
  5. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content; contact likely via forms.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response contacts published.
  7. WHOIS data missing, which is unusual and reduces trust score.
  8. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and consent management tools.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack with HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript libraries such as Slick Carousel for UI components. Usercentrics is integrated for consent management, and FriendlyCaptcha is used for bot protection on forms. Google Tag Manager is employed for analytics and marketing tags. The site is mobile-optimized and features good SEO practices with meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with some preloading of fonts and scripts. No CMS was explicitly detected. Hosting provider details are not available from the content. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional and user-friendly experience but could benefit from enhanced security header configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with infraserv.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review infraserv.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.