Skip to main content

Security report for infralogic.com

Infralogic · Energy · United States

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Infralogic is a specialized platform offering predictive analytics and comprehensive data services focused on global infrastructure investment opportunities, particularly in the energy and renewables sectors. It operates under the ION Group umbrella, leveraging a strong partnership ecosystem to provide market intelligence, fund intelligence, and profiling services tailored for advisors, banks, corporates, governments, investors, and legal professionals. The website demonstrates a professional and consistent brand presence with good content quality and clear navigation. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern frameworks such as Bootstrap and integrates multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools including Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, and 6sense. Hosting is supported by Microsoft Azure DNS infrastructure. While the site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly, performance is somewhat slow due to a large page size and resource count. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced, valid SPF records, and OCSP stapling enabled. However, improvements are recommended such as enabling HSTS, DNSSEC, and CAA records to enhance DNS and SSL security. Privacy compliance is robust, featuring a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism and a clear privacy policy aligned with GDPR requirements. Overall, Infralogic presents a trustworthy and credible digital presence with strong business and technical foundations, though there is room for performance and security enhancements to further strengthen its posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching infralogic.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
90
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Infralogic occupies a niche in the infrastructure investment analytics market, targeting a diverse audience from financial advisors to government agencies. Its business model centers on subscription access to a unified platform combining data, predictive analytics, and market intelligence. The company benefits from its association with ION Group and a network of partner services, enhancing its market reach and credibility. The platform's offerings address critical needs in deal origination, benchmarking, and market trend analysis, positioning it competitively in the energy and renewables sector. The presence of detailed content and partner integrations indicates a mature and strategically aligned business operation.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS using modern TLS protocols and no known SSL vulnerabilities. SPF records are correctly configured to protect email integrity. The presence of OCSP stapling improves certificate validation performance. However, the absence of HSTS and DNSSEC represents gaps that could expose the site to downgrade or DNS spoofing attacks. No explicit security or incident response policies are found on the site, which could be an area for improvement. The cookie consent mechanism is comprehensive, supporting GDPR compliance and user privacy. Overall, the security measures are good but could be enhanced with additional DNS and HTTP security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Enable HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload to prevent protocol downgrade attacks.
  2. Implement DNSSEC to secure DNS queries and prevent spoofing.
  3. Add CAA DNS records to restrict which certificate authorities can issue certificates for the domain.
  4. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Optimize website performance by reducing page size and resource count to improve load times and user experience.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Bootstrap 5 framework and uses jQuery along with plugins like Masonry and Owl Carousel for UI enhancements. It integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, 6sense, and LinkedIn Insight Tag. Hosting is supported by Microsoft Azure DNS infrastructure. The site is mobile responsive and SEO optimized with Yoast SEO plugin. However, the page load time is slow (over 14 seconds) with a large page size (~4MB) and high resource count (166), indicating potential technical debt or optimization opportunities. Security configurations are good but lack some advanced DNS and HTTP security features. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but could benefit from performance tuning and enhanced security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with infralogic.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review infralogic.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.