Skip to main content

Security report for infracert.no

KraftCERT AS · Energy · Norway

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

KraftCERT AS is a specialized non-profit cybersecurity organization focused on securing process control systems within the Norwegian energy sector, including power, petroleum, and related industries. It operates as an Information Sharing and Analysis Center (ISAC) and Incident Response Team (IRT), providing members with vulnerability monitoring, threat intelligence, incident handling, advisory services, exercises, and training. The organization is recognized nationally and internationally, holding certifications such as Trusted Introducer and membership in FIRST. The website reflects a professional and focused approach, targeting companies in critical infrastructure sectors with clear contact channels and published PGP keys for secure communication. Technically, the website employs modern frameworks like Bootstrap 5, ensuring mobile responsiveness and a good user experience. However, it lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, and no analytics or tracking scripts are detected, indicating a privacy-conscious design. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification, but the website content and contact information appear legitimate and consistent with the organization's mission. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates good practices such as HTTPS usage and incident response contact availability. The publication of PGP keys enhances secure communication. Nonetheless, the lack of security headers and formal privacy compliance documents represents areas for improvement. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional but could enhance compliance and security posture with additional policies and technical headers. The overall risk assessment is moderate with recommendations to improve privacy compliance, implement security headers, and publish vulnerability disclosure policies. These steps would strengthen trust and align the organization with best practices in cybersecurity governance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Twitter, LinkedIn

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching infracert.no

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
80
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

KraftCERT AS occupies a niche market position as a sector-specific cybersecurity entity serving the Norwegian energy and process industries. Its non-profit model focuses on collaboration, information sharing, and incident response, which provides competitive advantages in trust and sector integration. Revenue streams likely derive from membership fees and government contracts related to national preparedness. The target customer segment includes critical infrastructure operators in power, petroleum, water, and energy recovery sectors. The organization benefits from strategic partnerships, including InfraCERT and international bodies like FIRST. Growth indicators include active service offerings, training, and incident response capabilities. The partnership ecosystem is robust, with clear links to national and international cybersecurity communities. Operationally, KraftCERT demonstrates a mature approach to cybersecurity services tailored to its sector.

Security posture

KraftCERT exhibits a mature security posture appropriate for its role as an incident response and information sharing center. The website supports secure communication through published PGP keys and provides clear incident reporting channels. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security hardening of the web presence. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the website content. Compliance gaps exist due to missing privacy and cookie policies, which are critical under GDPR and NIS2 regulations applicable to critical infrastructure sectors. Incident response readiness is evident, with direct contact information and external reporting portals. The security culture appears strong internally but could benefit from enhanced transparency and formalized policies on the website.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Add security HTTP headers such as CSP, HSTS, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to improve web security.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance with accessibility standards.
  5. Consider adding analytics with privacy-respecting configurations to monitor website usage and improve user experience.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
KraftCERT AS
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
KraftCERT AS
Description
KraftCERT optimizes the security of process control systems for the power industry, providing members with updates on relevant vulnerabilities and threats to detect and counter digital attacks.
Key services
Vulnerability monitoring, Threat intelligence, Detection, Incident handling, Advisory, Exercises, Training
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 5, JavaScript
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL)
  • PGP keys published for secure communication
  • Incident response contact clearly provided

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact information is comprehensive and includes multiple phone numbers, emails, and physical address.
  4. Website uses modern Bootstrap framework and is mobile responsive.
  5. No analytics or tracking scripts detected, indicating privacy-conscious design.
  6. No forms found on the main page; incident reporting is directed to external URL.
  7. Social media presence on Twitter and LinkedIn is active and linked.
  8. Security best practices include PGP key publication and incident response contact.
  9. WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting domain trust verification.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Bootstrap 5, providing a modern responsive design and good mobile optimization. JavaScript is used minimally for email obfuscation and UI components. No CMS or third-party analytics tools were detected, indicating a lightweight and privacy-focused implementation. Performance is moderate, with no obvious heavy scripts or resources. The hosting provider and infrastructure details are not disclosed. The site lacks advanced SEO optimizations and accessibility features but maintains clear navigation and professional content structure. Technical debt appears low, but opportunities exist to modernize security headers and add structured data for enhanced search visibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with infracert.no. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review infracert.no.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.