Skip to main content

Security report for infor.pl

INFOR PL S.A. · Media · Poland

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

INFOR.PL is a leading Polish online portal serving accountants, entrepreneurs, HR professionals, and public sector employees with comprehensive legal, tax, and accounting information. The site offers a broad range of services including expert advice, legal interpretations, calculators, training, and e-commerce for related software and educational products. It holds a strong market position as the largest portal in its niche in Poland. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript frameworks and integrates multiple analytics and advertising platforms, ensuring a rich user experience with good mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and secure login mechanisms, though some security headers and policies could be improved. Privacy compliance is basic with cookie consent implemented but lacking a clearly visible privacy policy. Overall, the site is professional, content-rich, and trustworthy, with no signs of malicious or adult content.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching infor.pl

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates primarily in the media and information sector, targeting professionals in accounting, taxation, HR, and public administration. Its business model revolves around content provision, tools, training, and e-commerce sales. The extensive network of related subdomains and partner sites indicates a diversified service offering and strong ecosystem. The company appears large and well-established, though exact founding year and registrant details are not publicly available due to registry privacy. The portal's comprehensive content and professional design support its competitive advantage in the Polish market.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and secure login forms featuring password visibility toggles. No sensitive data is exposed in the HTML content. However, the absence of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates room for improvement in transparency and readiness. The use of multiple third-party analytics and advertising services increases the attack surface but appears well-managed. GDPR compliance indicators are minimal beyond cookie consent. Overall, security is good but could be enhanced by publishing policies and adding security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy prominently accessible on the website.
  2. Add terms of service and security policy pages to improve transparency and compliance.
  3. Implement and serve security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  4. Introduce a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all users.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
INFOR PL S.A.
Description
INFOR.pl is the largest Polish portal for accountants, entrepreneurs, and HR professionals providing current legal acts, expert advice, interpretations, tools, calculators, indicators, forms, templates, quizzes, and legal and tax information.
Key services
Legal and tax news and updates, Calculators and indicators, Expert advice and interpretations, Training and e-learning, E-commerce for software and training, Quizzes and educational content
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Google Ads GPT, Gemius Analytics, SalesManago, PushPushGo, Quickwrap Ads, Litepicker (date picker), Font: Roboto
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure login forms with password toggle
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security tokens in login forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Gemius, Google Analytics, Chartbeat, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ad Manager, MGID
Tracking pixels
Gemius, Chartbeat, Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
SalesManago, PushPushGo, Quickwrap
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is content-rich and professionally designed.
  2. No WHOIS public data available due to .pl registry policy.
  3. Uses multiple third-party analytics and advertising services.
  4. Has login, registration, and password reset forms with security features.
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found in provided content.
  6. Cookie consent mechanism is present and active.
  7. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information.
  8. No explicit contact emails found; phone support number present in login error box.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  10. Content is safe and targeted at general professional audience.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based frontend with asynchronous loading of multiple third-party scripts for analytics, advertising, and marketing automation. It employs Google Tag Manager, Google Ads GPT, Gemius analytics, SalesManago marketing automation, and PushPushGo push notifications. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and uses the Roboto font. Performance is moderate, likely due to multiple external scripts and ad networks. No CMS is explicitly detected. Hosting provider details are not evident from the content. The site uses secure HTTPS connections and modern web technologies but could benefit from optimization to reduce third-party script load and improve accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with infor.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review infor.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.