Skip to main content

Security report for influencersgonewild.org

Influencers GoneWild · Media · N/a

Partial score · DNS & email only

75/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Influencers GoneWild is an adult content website specializing in hosting and aggregating leaked and explicit videos of influencers and celebrities. The site targets adult content consumers interested in influencer-related media and operates primarily through advertising revenue. The business model is content aggregation with monetization via ads and affiliate links. The website uses WordPress CMS with common SEO and performance plugins, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The site is mobile optimized and has basic SEO implementation but lacks advanced privacy and security features. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but missing important security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms. The WHOIS data is unavailable, which reduces trust and legitimacy. Overall, the site presents moderate risk due to content type, lack of transparency, and limited security controls.

Scanned

3 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching influencersgonewild.org

This scan found 13 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
Average
76
After the cap
75

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention influencersgonewild.org, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for influencersgonewild.org right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website occupies a niche in the adult entertainment market focusing on influencer and celebrity leaked content. It leverages partnerships with related adult sites and uses multiple ad networks and tracking services to monetize traffic. The lack of clear business contact information and registrant data suggests an anonymous or privacy-protected operation common in this sector. The site’s content and partnerships indicate a strategy to attract traffic through trending influencer content. Growth indicators are not visible, and the site appears to be a small-scale operation with limited brand trust signals.

Security posture

The site enforces HTTPS, which is a positive security baseline. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, increasing exposure to common web attacks. The presence of multiple third-party ad and tracking scripts introduces privacy risks and potential vulnerabilities. No incident response or security policy information is provided, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are found. Privacy compliance is minimal, with no cookie consent mechanism detected. The absence of WHOIS data further reduces trust. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires significant improvements to meet best practices and compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Add explicit cookie consent banners and improve privacy policy to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  3. Review and limit third-party ad and tracking scripts to reduce privacy risks.
  4. Publish clear contact information and security policy to improve trust and incident response readiness.
  5. Obtain and publish accurate WHOIS and business registration information to enhance legitimacy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Influencers GoneWild
Description
Website hosting and sharing adult content videos featuring influencers and celebrities, focusing on leaked or explicit media.
Key services
Adult video content hosting, Content aggregation, Advertising
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO Premium, jQuery, LazyLoad, Bootstrap, Google Fonts, Google Adsense, Histats
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics and tracking

Services
Ahrefs Analytics, Histats
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Adsense, YourAdExchange, AdsCo
Tracking pixels
Histats, Ahrefs Analytics
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO Premium
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website hosts adult content videos focusing on leaked influencer media.
  2. No clear company contact information or physical address found.
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are minimal or missing consent mechanisms.
  4. Heavy use of third-party ad and tracking scripts.
  5. No security headers detected; HTTPS is enabled.
  6. WHOIS data is unavailable or malformed, limiting trust assessment.
  7. Site uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and SEO tools.
  8. Navigation and SEO are reasonably well implemented.
  9. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Bootstrap framework and uses popular plugins such as Yoast SEO Premium for SEO optimization. It employs lazy loading for images and integrates multiple third-party analytics and ad networks including Google Adsense and Histats. The site is mobile responsive with moderate performance. However, there is no evidence of advanced hosting or CDN services. The technical implementation is standard for small to medium WordPress sites but lacks advanced security configurations and privacy controls. The presence of suspicious external domains related to ad services should be reviewed for security and privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with influencersgonewild.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review influencersgonewild.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.