Skip to main content

Security report for infield.live

infield.live · Media · Germany

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

infield.live is a German-focused online platform dedicated to festival and event discovery, ticket booking, and travel planning. It offers users access to over 125 festivals and conferences, emphasizing flexible ticket booking with free cancellation. The platform targets festival enthusiasts in Germany, positioning itself as a niche media and ticketing service within the entertainment sector. The website is professionally designed with consistent branding and good content quality, supporting its market presence as a specialized event platform. Technically, the website is built on WordPress and leverages modern web technologies including jQuery, MediaElement.js for video playback, and integrates tracking tools such as Matomo, Facebook Pixel, and Google Tag Manager. The site is mobile-optimized and implements GDPR-compliant privacy and cookie policies, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. However, some video playback issues and missing advanced security headers indicate areas for technical improvement. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks certain security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could enhance protection against common web threats. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The WHOIS data is privacy protected by Identity Digital Inc., which is typical for small to medium websites and does not raise immediate trust concerns. Overall, infield.live presents a solid business and technical foundation with a good security posture for its size and sector. Strategic enhancements in security headers and video content delivery would further strengthen its resilience and user experience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching infield.live

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
85
Email security
35
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
68
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention infield.live, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for infield.live right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

infield.live operates in the German festival and event market, offering discovery and ticketing services with a unique selling point of free ticket cancellation. Its business model relies on online ticket sales and event promotion, targeting festival-goers primarily in Germany. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its curated festival selection and flexible booking options. The company appears to be a small-sized entity founded around 2023, with no publicly disclosed parent or subsidiary companies. Its partnership with hoemepage.com suggests collaboration within the event service ecosystem. The platform's growth potential is supported by its digital presence and integration of social media channels, although direct contact information is limited on the site.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, aligning with GDPR requirements. However, the absence of advanced security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options represents a gap that could expose the site to clickjacking, MIME sniffing, and other web-based attacks. The use of third-party tracking scripts introduces privacy considerations, though these are managed with consent mechanisms. Video playback errors may affect user experience but do not pose direct security risks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are publicly available, indicating an opportunity to improve transparency and readiness. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could benefit from enhancements to align with best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options HTTP headers to strengthen web security.
  2. Resolve MediaElement.js video playback issues to improve user experience and accessibility.
  3. Publish a clear incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy to enhance transparency and trust.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance contact information visibility to improve business credibility and user support.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
infield.live
Description
Entdecke, buche & bereise die spannendsten Festivals Deutschlands. Buche Festivaltickets flexibel mit kostenloser Stornierungsoption auf infield.
Key services
Festival discovery, Ticket booking with free cancellation, Event information and stories
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, MediaElement.js, Matomo (tracking), Facebook Pixel, Google Tag Manager, Ninja Forms
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo, Google Analytics (via GTM), Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Matomo
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, Matomo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Content is in German and targets festival attendees in Germany
  3. Uses modern web technologies and tracking tools
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage
  5. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies publicly visible
  7. WHOIS data is privacy protected, limiting registrant transparency
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including jQuery and MediaElement.js for multimedia content. It integrates multiple analytics and tracking tools such as Matomo, Facebook Pixel, and Google Tag Manager, indicating a data-driven approach to user engagement. The site uses responsive design techniques and custom fonts loaded from CDN, ensuring good mobile optimization and branding consistency. Performance is moderate, with some video playback errors noted. The absence of advanced security headers and limited hosting provider information suggest areas for infrastructure improvement. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business goals but requires attention to security and multimedia delivery for optimal operation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with infield.live. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review infield.live.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.