Skip to main content

Security report for infantjournal.co.uk

Stansted News Limited · Healthcare · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, DNS health and 2 other checks.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Infant journal is a specialized UK-based healthcare publication targeting neonatal and paediatric healthcare professionals. It offers bi-monthly authoritative articles, open access to past issues, and additional resources such as a supplier guide and job listings. The website is professionally designed with a consistent brand and clear navigation, supporting a subscription-based business model supplemented by advertising and sponsored content. Technically, the site uses modern frameworks like Bootstrap and integrates Google Analytics for user tracking. However, some security best practices such as security headers and cookie consent mechanisms are missing. The WHOIS data is unavailable and indicates domain registration issues, which raises some concerns about domain legitimacy despite the professional appearance and content quality. Overall, the site is safe for general audiences and demonstrates good business credibility but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy compliance measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 4 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates

  2. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Unregistered MX Record

      MX record points to unregistered domain: relay2.bt.net

      What to do: Remove or fix MX record pointing to unregistered domain

      • RFC 5321 §5.1
      • NIS2 21(2)(i)
      • IR 2024/2690 12.4: Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 12.4: Asset inventory
      • NIST CM-8: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-8: System Component Inventory
    • High

      Unregistered MX Record

      MX record points to unregistered domain: relay3.bt.net

      What to do: Remove or fix MX record pointing to unregistered domain

      • RFC 5321 §5.1
      • NIS2 21(2)(i)
      • IR 2024/2690 12.4: Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 12.4: Asset inventory
      • NIST CM-8: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-8: System Component Inventory
    • High

      Unregistered MX Record

      MX record points to unregistered domain: relay1.bt.net

      What to do: Remove or fix MX record pointing to unregistered domain

      • RFC 5321 §5.1
      • NIS2 21(2)(i)
      • IR 2024/2690 12.4: Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 12.4: Asset inventory
      • NIST CM-8: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-8: System Component Inventory

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching infantjournal.co.uk

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
37
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
15
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Infant journal holds a leading position in the UK neonatal and paediatric healthcare niche, serving a specialized professional audience. Its revenue streams likely include subscriptions, advertising, and sponsored supplements. The company behind the site is Stansted News Limited, a small-sized entity focused on healthcare media. The website's partnership ecosystem includes several healthcare product companies featured in the supplier guide. Growth indicators include regular publication updates and active social media presence. The business model emphasizes authoritative content and community engagement through newsletters and job postings, positioning it as a trusted resource in its sector.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS usage implied by external script sources. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces its defense against common web attacks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The lack of a cookie consent mechanism is a compliance gap under GDPR. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies are not present, indicating limited formal security governance. The WHOIS data inconsistency is a notable risk factor, suggesting the need for domain registration verification. Overall, the site is functional but should improve security controls and privacy compliance to reduce risk.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and mechanism to comply with GDPR and improve user privacy transparency.
  3. Verify and correct domain registration details to resolve WHOIS inconsistencies and strengthen domain legitimacy.
  4. Develop and publish formal security and incident response policies to improve security governance and user trust.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users and meet web standards.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Stansted News Limited
Description
Infant journal is the leading UK publication for the multidisciplinary team that cares for vulnerable sick or premature babies in their first year of life. Published bi-monthly, it contains authoritative clinical and practical articles written by experts.
Key services
Bi-monthly journal publication, Online article access, Sponsored supplements, Supplier guide, Job listings, Conference calendar, Advertising opportunities
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics (gtag.js), jQuery 3.5.1, Bootstrap 4.5.2, FontAwesome 5.15.4, Slick Carousel, Google Fonts (Noto Sans)
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied by external scripts loaded over HTTPS
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional healthcare journal focused on neonatal and paediatric care.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable and indicates domain registration issues.
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in HTML; contact form and social media links present.
  4. No cookie consent mechanism detected despite GDPR-relevant audience.
  5. Uses modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  6. No security headers detected; HTTPS usage implied but not confirmed.
  7. No vulnerability disclosures or security policies found.
  8. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
  9. Advertising is present but limited to partner banners and sponsored supplements.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Bootstrap 4.5.2 for responsive design, jQuery 3.5.1 for DOM manipulation, FontAwesome 5.15.4 for icons, and Slick Carousel for content sliders. Google Analytics via gtag.js is used for visitor tracking. The site loads external resources over HTTPS, indicating secure transport. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected in the HTML content. The site is mobile optimized with separate navigation for mobile devices. SEO is supported by meta tags and structured navigation. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Technical debt appears low but could be improved with enhanced accessibility and security features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with infantjournal.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review infantjournal.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.