Skip to main content

Security report for inelfe.eu

INELFE · Energy · France

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

INELFE is a specialized company focused on the construction and operation of electrical interconnections between France and Spain, aiming to enhance electricity exchange capacity within Europe. Established following a bilateral government agreement in 2008, it has successfully completed major infrastructure projects such as Baixas-Santa Llogaia and Golfe de Gascogne. The company targets energy sector stakeholders and governmental bodies, positioning itself as a key player in European energy infrastructure. Technically, the website is built on Drupal CMS with Bootstrap 3, incorporating modern web technologies and responsive design. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Analytics for data collection and uses a cookie consent management tool compliant with GDPR. The site performs moderately well with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent mechanisms but lacks visible advanced security headers and published security policies. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. WHOIS data is privacy-protected, which is typical for such entities, and no suspicious patterns were found. Overall, the website demonstrates a professional and trustworthy online presence with room for improvement in security policy transparency and technical security hardening. The risk level is low, but strategic enhancements in security posture and compliance documentation are recommended.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching inelfe.eu

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
50
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

INELFE operates in the energy and transportation sectors, focusing on cross-border electrical infrastructure. Its business model revolves around infrastructure development and operation, supported by European government agreements and partnerships with major transmission system operators like REE Spain and RTE France. The company benefits from EU funding and positions itself as a technological innovator with environmental and local employment commitments. The website reflects a medium-sized enterprise with a clear market niche and strong partnerships, targeting industry professionals and public stakeholders. Growth indicators include ongoing projects and public communications emphasizing technological and environmental leadership.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. The website uses HTTPS and cookie consent tools, indicating baseline compliance with privacy regulations. However, the absence of explicit security headers, published security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms suggests gaps in security governance and transparency. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found, but the lack of security.txt or DPO contact information limits incident response readiness. Compliance with GDPR is implied but not explicitly documented. Overall, the security culture appears functional but could benefit from formalized policies and enhanced technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive security policy including incident response procedures and contact information.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program and publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and libraries.
  5. Improve transparency by providing clear data retention policies and detailed privacy compliance documentation.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
INELFE SAS
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
INELFE
Description
INELFE is a company responsible for constructing and operating electrical interconnections between France and Spain to increase electricity exchange capacity between the Iberian Peninsula and the rest of Europe. It was established following the Zaragoza agreement between the Spanish and French governments in 2008. The company has completed projects such as Baixas-Santa Llogaia and Golfe de Gascogne interconnections.
Key services
Construction and operation of electrical interconnections, Increasing electricity exchange capacity, Environmental impact mitigation, Local employment creation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal CMS, Bootstrap 3.3.7, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Tarteaucitron cookie consent
Frameworks
Drupal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented in French with multilingual support.
  3. No exposed sensitive data or security misconfigurations detected.
  4. Cookie consent is implemented with a detailed cookie management panel.
  5. WHOIS data is not publicly available due to EURid privacy policies.
  6. No direct contact emails found on the homepage; phone numbers and addresses are present in footer.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected.
  9. Use of multiple third-party analytics and tag management scripts.
  10. Website uses Drupal CMS with Bootstrap 3 framework.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal CMS with Bootstrap 3, leveraging jQuery and various third-party scripts including Google Tag Manager and Analytics. The site is mobile responsive with a moderate performance profile. The use of Tarteaucitron for cookie consent demonstrates attention to privacy compliance. However, the technology stack includes older Bootstrap and jQuery versions, which may pose maintenance and security challenges. No hosting provider details were identified. The site lacks advanced SEO structured data and comprehensive accessibility features. Technical risks include potential vulnerabilities in outdated libraries and absence of security headers. Modernization and technical debt reduction are recommended to improve resilience and performance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with inelfe.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review inelfe.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.