Skip to main content

Security report for indosgroup.com

INDOS Financial Limited | JTC Group · Finance · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

INDOS Financial Limited, a subsidiary of JTC Group, is a specialized provider of AIFMD depositary and fund oversight services, regulated by the FCA. The company targets investment funds and fund managers, offering a range of services including depositary duties, ESG oversight, Cayman Islands private fund services, and AML officer roles. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear navigation and relevant content tailored to its financial services audience. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern integrations such as Wistia for video, Google Analytics, and Tag Manager for tracking, and is mobile optimized with good SEO practices. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though some improvements in security headers and incident response disclosures are recommended. Overall, the site is trustworthy and credible with strong business and technical foundations.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
48/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching indosgroup.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
25
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
48
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

INDOS Financial holds a solid market position as an independent, FCA regulated fund oversight provider with over 25 years of senior management experience. Their business model focuses on specialized depositary and oversight services for alternative investment funds, targeting institutional clients and fund managers. The company leverages its parent company JTC Group's resources and brand reputation. The presence of client testimonials and certifications such as ISAE and Carbon Neutral status enhance trust. The company maintains active engagement through social media and industry events, indicating growth and market presence. The website supports lead generation through service brochures and video content, reflecting a mature digital marketing approach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options represents an area for improvement. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which could be enhanced to improve transparency and readiness. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics and Wistia is standard but should be regularly audited for security. Cookie consent mechanisms are not implemented, which may affect GDPR compliance. Overall, the security measures are adequate but could be strengthened to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add an incident response contact or security@ email address and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Introduce a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply fully with GDPR and ePrivacy regulations.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and provide more detailed contact information including physical addresses to improve user trust and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
INDOS Financial Limited | JTC Group
Description
INDOS Financial is an award-winning independent, FCA regulated AIFMD Depositary & alternative investment fund oversight provider.
Key services
AIFMD Depositary Services, ESG Oversight, Cayman Islands Private Funds, Money Laundering Reporting Officer Services, DEPOcheck
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Wistia video embeds, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Mailchimp, FontAwesome, Typekit fonts
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Analytics with async loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Mailchimp, Omniture (a.omappapi.com)
Marketing tools
Mailchimp
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well structured
  2. Content is relevant and targeted to financial services and fund oversight
  3. Strong trust signals including FCA regulation and client testimonials
  4. Use of modern web technologies and video content
  5. No visible security or privacy policy gaps except lack of explicit cookie consent mechanism
  6. No WAF or blocking detected, full content accessible
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including jQuery, FontAwesome, Typekit fonts, and Wistia video embeds. It uses Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking and Mailchimp for marketing. The site is mobile responsive and has good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data for organization, website, and video content. Performance is moderate with deferred and async loading of scripts. There is no explicit hosting provider identified from the HTML content. The site uses caching and optimization plugins as indicated by autoptimize CSS files. Technical debt appears low, but improvements in security headers and cookie consent implementation are recommended to modernize and secure the infrastructure further.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with indosgroup.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review indosgroup.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.