Skip to main content

Security report for indo-fxpro.com

FxPro UK Limited · Finance · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FxPro UK Limited operates a comprehensive online trading platform targeting retail and institutional clients globally, including Indonesia. The company offers a wide range of financial instruments including Forex, CFDs on shares, futures, indices, metals, energies, cryptocurrencies, and ETFs. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and provides extensive educational resources and trading tools. The technical infrastructure leverages modern JavaScript frameworks and integrates multiple analytics and marketing technologies, ensuring a robust digital presence. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, modern security headers, and no visible vulnerabilities, although public security policies and incident response information are not explicitly published. The domain WHOIS data is missing, which raises some concerns about domain registration legitimacy; however, the strong brand presence, regulatory licenses, and consistent business information mitigate this risk. Overall, the website demonstrates a mature, secure, and user-friendly platform suitable for its target market.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google Ads

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching indo-fxpro.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
35
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

FxPro holds a strong market position as a regulated broker with multiple licenses from FCA, CySEC, FSCA, and SCB, serving over 3 million client accounts worldwide. The business model focuses on providing multi-asset trading services via popular platforms like MetaTrader and cTrader. Revenue streams likely include spreads, commissions, and value-added services such as VPS and educational content. The company targets a broad audience from novice to professional traders, supported by multilingual content and localized domains. The partnership ecosystem includes various regional domains and service portals. The company’s growth is supported by extensive marketing, affiliate programs, and a strong regulatory compliance framework.

Security posture

The website exhibits a high security maturity level with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and encrypted data collection forms. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. However, the absence of a public security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure program limits transparency. GDPR compliance is indicated through privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms. Incident response readiness and data protection officer contact details are not publicly available, representing an area for improvement. Overall, the security posture is robust but could benefit from enhanced transparency and formalized security governance disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and controls.
  2. Establish and publicize an incident response and vulnerability disclosure program.
  3. Provide explicit contact information for a Data Protection Officer or privacy contact.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to minimize tracking and privacy risks.
  5. Enhance transparency around data retention policies and user data handling.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
FxPro UK Limited
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
FxPro UK Limited
Description
FxPro is a global online broker providing trading services in Forex, CFDs on shares, futures, indices, metals, energies, cryptocurrencies and ETFs. Established in 2006, serving clients in over 170 countries.
Key services
Forex trading, CFD trading, Multiple trading platforms (MT4, MT5, cTrader, WebTrader), Educational resources, Trading tools and calculators
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, React, Amplitude Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Bing Ads, Taboola, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Twitter Universal Website Tag, Yandex Metrica
Frameworks
React
Platforms
MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader, WebTrader
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of modern security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with encryption notice

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Amplitude Analytics, Yandex Metrica, Facebook Analytics, LinkedIn Analytics, Twitter Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
NextRoll, Taboola, Bing Ads, Google AdSense
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Amplitude Analytics, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Twitter Universal Website Tag, Yandex Metrica
Marketing tools
Amplitude
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multiple language support.
  2. Strong regulatory disclosures and multiple licenses displayed.
  3. Comprehensive educational and trading resources available.
  4. Multiple trading platforms supported with detailed account types.
  5. Robust privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  6. Extensive use of third-party analytics and marketing tools.
  7. No security blocking or WAF challenges detected.
  8. WHOIS data missing or domain unregistered, which is unusual for a regulated broker.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React-based frontend with extensive use of JavaScript libraries for analytics and marketing. Hosting is via Azure CDN ensuring fast global delivery. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible with good SEO practices including meta tags and structured data. The technical stack supports multiple trading platforms and integrates APIs for real-time data. Performance is fast with preloading and asynchronous script loading. Technical risks are minimal but reliance on multiple third-party tracking services could pose privacy concerns. Opportunities exist to streamline scripts and improve accessibility further.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with indo-fxpro.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review indo-fxpro.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.