Skip to main content

Security report for index.lv

INVL · Finance · Latvia

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

INVL is a Latvian financial services company specializing in pension funds and investment management with over 20 years of experience. The website presents a professional image with clear focus on pension savings and alternative investments, targeting Latvian investors and institutional clients. The technical infrastructure is based on WordPress CMS with modern JavaScript libraries and Google Charts integration, complemented by a Cookiebot consent mechanism ensuring GDPR compliance. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though security headers and explicit security policies are absent. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professionally maintained, but could improve transparency by publishing privacy and security policies and providing direct contact information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching index.lv

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
25
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

INVL operates in the finance sector, focusing on pension funds and family office services in Latvia. The company leverages its 20 years of market presence to position itself as a reliable investment partner. Its business model centers on asset management and personalized consulting. The website reflects a mature digital presence with integrated marketing and analytics tools such as Facebook Pixel, TikTok Pixel, and Google Analytics. The absence of direct contact details and privacy policy pages suggests room for improvement in customer engagement and compliance transparency. The external domains linked are primarily trusted service providers for analytics and consent management, indicating a well-structured partnership ecosystem.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses a reputable cookie consent platform (Cookiebot), demonstrating commitment to user privacy and security. However, the lack of security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces the overall security posture. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information is present, limiting transparency for security researchers. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The site would benefit from publishing incident response procedures and security policies to enhance trust and readiness. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with good foundational practices but lacking advanced security controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the homepage.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve security transparency.
  4. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer support and security incidents.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure compliance with privacy regulations and minimize tracking footprint.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
INVL
Description
20 gadu pieredze un profesionalitāte. Ieguldījumi Latvijā. Personiska attieksme. Individuālas konsultācijas.
Key services
Pension funds management, Investment consulting, Family office services, Alternative investments
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, jQuery 3.7.1, jQuery UI 1.13.3, Google Charts, Cookiebot consent management
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Meta Platforms, Inc., TikTok
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, TikTok Pixel
Marketing tools
Omnisend
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Uses WordPress CMS with modern plugins and scripts.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented via Cookiebot.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in provided content.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  6. External links mostly to trusted domains for analytics, consent, and social media.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  9. Content is professional and focused on pension funds and investment services in Latvia.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2 with jQuery and jQuery UI libraries, and integrates Google Charts for data visualization. Cookiebot is used for cookie consent management, indicating GDPR awareness. The site loads multiple external scripts from trusted domains, including analytics and marketing platforms. Performance appears moderate with standard optimization practices. Mobile responsiveness is good, and SEO is supported by Yoast SEO plugin metadata and structured JSON-LD data. Accessibility is basic but present. Hosting provider details are not evident from the HTML content. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with index.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review index.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.