Skip to main content

Security report for indevex.com

Indevex · Healthcare · Denmark

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Indevex is a small healthcare-focused company specializing in the development of science-based nutritional products, such as NGC®, aimed at supporting health, recovery, and performance. The company positions itself as a niche innovator leveraging clinical research to back its product offerings. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with good content quality and SEO optimization, targeting health-conscious consumers and athletes. Technically, the site is built on WordPress 6.8.1, utilizing modern technologies including Google Tag Manager for analytics and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. The site is mobile-optimized and performs moderately well, though accessibility features are basic. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data, but lacks security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is partial, with a cookie consent mechanism present but no explicit privacy policy or terms of service detected. Overall, the domain is legitimate, long-established since 1999, and registered through a reputable registrar without privacy protection, supporting trustworthiness. Strategic improvements in privacy transparency, security headers, and contact information publication are recommended to enhance compliance and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching indevex.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
88
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Indevex operates in the healthcare sector with a focus on nutritional supplements backed by scientific research. Its business model centers on product development and sales, targeting a specialized audience interested in health and performance. The company benefits from a consistent brand presence and clinical innovation as competitive advantages. The website's use of SEO and analytics tools indicates a moderate digital maturity. No direct partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content. The absence of explicit contact details and legal policies suggests areas for growth in transparency and customer engagement. The company’s long domain history supports stability and market presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and a cookie consent mechanism in place, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security represents a gap in defense-in-depth strategies. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The absence of a published security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure program limits the organization's transparency and readiness to handle security incidents. Compliance with GDPR is partially indicated by the cookie consent but lacks comprehensive documentation. Enhancing security policies and technical controls would improve the overall security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure essential security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to strengthen protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear and comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  3. Add explicit contact information including support and security incident response channels to facilitate communication and transparency.
  4. Develop and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Enhance website accessibility features to meet recognized standards and improve user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Indevex
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Indevex
Description
Indevex develops science-based nutritional products like NGC®, supporting health, recovery, and performance through clinically backed innovation.
Key services
Development of nutritional products, Clinical research support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent banner
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses WordPress CMS with modern SEO plugins (Rank Math PRO).
  2. Cookie consent is managed by Cookiebot with a detailed consent dialog.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found in the provided content.
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses explicitly found in the HTML content.
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy detected.
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  7. Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL configuration.
  8. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform (version 6.8.1) with integration of SEO tools (Rank Math PRO), analytics (Google Tag Manager), and cookie consent management (Cookiebot). The technical stack includes standard web technologies such as HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript. Performance is moderate with no critical errors detected. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO meta tags are well implemented including Open Graph and Twitter Card metadata. However, the site lacks advanced security headers and accessibility features. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified beyond the registrar information. The site uses asynchronous loading for scripts to improve performance. Overall, the technical infrastructure is sound but could benefit from enhanced security and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with indevex.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review indevex.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.