Skip to main content

Security report for inderes.fi

Inderes Oyj · Finance · Finland

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Inderes Oyj operates a comprehensive investment research and community platform primarily targeting stock market investors and listed companies in Finland. The platform offers a wide range of services including detailed company analyses, market reviews, webcast events, and a vibrant investor forum. It supports multiple languages and provides both free and premium content, positioning itself as a leading Finnish financial research service. Technically, the website is built on modern frameworks such as Next.js and React, hosted and accelerated via Cloudflare CDN, ensuring fast and reliable access. Security measures are robust with HTTPS enforcement, multiple security headers, and secure cookie practices, although enabling HSTS with subdomain inclusion and DNSSEC could further enhance security. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, Inderes demonstrates a mature digital presence with strong business credibility and a high-quality user experience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
18/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching inderes.fi

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
60
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
18
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Inderes holds a strong market position as Finland's largest equity research team and a popular investment community. Its business model revolves around providing independent, high-quality financial analyses and tools to retail and institutional investors, as well as offering services to listed companies. Revenue streams likely include premium subscriptions, corporate services, and partnerships. The target audience includes individual investors, financial professionals, and listed companies seeking investor relations support. The company maintains a broad partnership ecosystem including media outlets and financial platforms like Kauppalehti and Nordnet. Growth indicators include a large and active user base, frequent content updates, and expanding premium offerings. Strategic observations highlight a focus on transparency, community engagement, and leveraging technology to deliver timely and relevant investment insights.

Security posture

The website exhibits a strong security posture with enforced HTTPS, secure cookie attributes (HttpOnly, Secure, SameSite), and comprehensive security headers such as X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-XSS-Protection. The presence of a Content-Security-Policy header further mitigates risks of cross-site scripting. No vulnerable cipher suites or SSL issues were detected, and the SSL certificate is valid and not self-signed. However, the absence of DNSSEC and CAA records indicates potential areas for DNS security improvement. There is no explicit security policy or incident response information publicly available, which could be enhanced to improve transparency and readiness. Overall, the site follows best practices but could benefit from additional DNS security measures and published security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload to strengthen HTTPS enforcement.
  2. Implement DNSSEC to protect against DNS spoofing and cache poisoning attacks.
  3. Add CAA DNS records to restrict certificate authorities authorized to issue certificates for the domain.
  4. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible to users and partners.
  5. Regularly audit and update Content-Security-Policy to adapt to new threats and third-party integrations.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Next.js, a modern React framework, indicating a server-side rendered and statically optimized architecture. It uses Cloudflare for CDN and security, enhancing performance and protection. The site loads quickly with zero reported load time and resource count in the provided data, suggesting efficient resource management. It employs modern security headers and cookie practices. Analytics are handled via Plausible, a privacy-focused analytics service, minimizing invasive tracking. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility features. The use of multiple JavaScript chunks and preloading strategies indicates a well-structured front-end build. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern, performant, and secure, supporting a high-quality user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with inderes.fi. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review inderes.fi.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.