Skip to main content

Security report for independent.co.uk

The Independent · Media · United Kingdom

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

88/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Independent is a prominent UK-based news media organization providing breaking news, commentary, and premium editorial content. It operates a large-scale digital publishing platform with international editions and a broad target audience. The website demonstrates a mature technical infrastructure leveraging modern JavaScript frameworks, extensive analytics, and advertising technologies. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement and use of reputable third-party services, though explicit security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance indicators are limited in the provided content, with no clear privacy or cookie policy links detected. WHOIS data retrieval failed due to domain naming rules, but the website's content and branding strongly support its legitimacy. Overall, the site is professional, content-rich, and trustworthy, with room for enhanced privacy transparency and security header implementation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching independent.co.uk

This scan found 10 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
79
Security headers
95
Email security
95
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
88

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Brand lookalikes

Add-on

Domains that imitate independent.co.uk and could be used for phishing or spoofed email, tracked in OffSeq Breach.

Tracked
18
Registered
18
Resolving
18
High or critical
0

Last checked 2026-06-26

Masked preview

  • in•••••••••.co.ukMediumbitsquatting
  • in••••••••••.co.ukMediumhomoglyph
  • im•••••••••.co.ukMediumhomoglyph

See the full lookalike list

A one-off add-on that lists up to 20 of the highest-risk lookalikes of independent.co.uk with registration, mail-server, certificate and DNS signals.

Select it in the checkout above.

Lookalike data refreshes continuously. Monitoring on Breach alerts you when a variant is registered, gains a mail server or starts serving HTTPS.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Independent holds a strong market position as a major UK news outlet with a diversified business model including advertising, premium subscriptions, and multimedia content. Its target customers are general news consumers interested in politics, culture, and lifestyle. The company leverages partnerships with major ad networks and marketing platforms to monetize its content. The digital ecosystem is complex, involving multiple third-party services for analytics, advertising, and user engagement. Growth indicators include active content updates and international editions. Strategic observations suggest maintaining brand trust and expanding privacy compliance will be key to sustaining market leadership.

Security posture

The website exhibits a solid security posture with HTTPS enabled and no visible exposure of sensitive data. Use of modern libraries and frameworks reduces risk of legacy vulnerabilities. However, explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options are not clearly present in the analyzed content and should be verified and implemented if missing. The extensive use of third-party scripts necessitates ongoing vulnerability management. Privacy compliance is currently weak based on available data, indicating a potential compliance gap with GDPR and related regulations. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly evident, suggesting an area for improvement in transparency and readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and clearly link comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to enhance GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Audit and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Regularly review third-party scripts and ad networks for vulnerabilities and privacy impact.
  4. Provide clear contact information for security incidents and data protection officer to improve incident response transparency.
  5. Enhance website accessibility and SEO by maintaining structured data and semantic HTML best practices.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
The Independent
Description
The latest breaking news, comment and features from The Independent.
Key services
news reporting, editorials, premium content subscription, multimedia content
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Crazy Egg, Prebid.js, DoubleClick, Sentry, Viafoura, Piano, Taboola, jQuery
Frameworks
React
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of modern JavaScript libraries
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (GA4), Crazy Egg, Chartbeat, DotMetrics, Braze
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
DoubleClick, Index Exchange, Ad You Like, 33Across, Improve Digital, JWP, Kargo, Mediagrid, Minute Media, Pubmatic, Rubicon, Xandr, Yieldmo, GumGum, Ozone Project, Invibes, Criteo, Epsilon
Tracking pixels
Crazy Egg, Viafoura, Braze
Marketing tools
Braze, Taboola
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. Strong use of modern web technologies and analytics.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policy links found in the provided HTML snippet.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the snippet.
  5. Social media presence confirmed via structured data and links.
  6. Advertising and tracking scripts are extensive but standard for media sites.
  7. WHOIS data is incomplete due to lookup error; domain appears legitimate based on content.
Technical notes

Notes

The Independent's website is built on a modern React-based front end with extensive use of JavaScript libraries and third-party integrations for analytics, advertising, and user engagement. Performance is moderate with optimizations such as font preloading and responsive images. Mobile optimization is good, supporting multiple device types. The site uses advanced ad tech including Prebid.js and multiple demand partners, indicating a sophisticated monetization strategy. Technical risks include dependency on numerous external domains and scripts, which require vigilant security and privacy management. The absence of explicit CMS identification suggests a custom or proprietary content management solution.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 92/100 −1Low16 findingsView report
  2. 93/100Low15 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with independent.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review independent.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.