Skip to main content

Security report for inddigo.com

Inddigo · Energy · France

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Inddigo is a well-established French consulting and engineering firm specializing in ecological and energy transition services for public and private sectors. Founded in 1986, it employs over 400 professionals across 16 locations in France and the Caribbean. The company offers a broad range of services including consulting, engineering, training, and innovation to support sustainable development and complex territorial projects. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and SEO-friendly, leveraging WordPress with modern plugins such as Yoast SEO and WP Rocket for performance. Security posture is good with HTTPS and some security headers, but lacks explicit privacy, cookie, and incident response policies visible on the site. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy, though the website content and business information appear credible and trustworthy. Overall, the site demonstrates a mature digital presence but would benefit from enhanced transparency in privacy and security policies.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: LinkedIn, YouTube, Cloudflare

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching inddigo.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
50
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
35
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Inddigo occupies a strong market position as a pioneer in ecological transition consulting in France. Its business model revolves around providing expert advice, engineering solutions, and professional training to a diverse clientele including public authorities and private enterprises. The company emphasizes innovation and systemic approaches to address complex environmental challenges. The presence of certifications like Qualiopi for training and a large, engaged workforce indicates operational maturity. The website content targets environmentally conscious organizations and stakeholders involved in sustainable development. While the company appears independent and innovative, the lack of visible contact details and domain registration data suggests areas for improvement in transparency and trust-building.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and uses security best practices such as lazy loading and optimized scripts. However, explicit security headers like X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options are not clearly present, and the Content Security Policy shows some violations. There is no visible security or incident response policy, nor a security.txt file for vulnerability disclosure. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. The security score is moderate, reflecting good baseline protections but room for improvement in policy transparency and header implementation. The absence of WHOIS data also impacts trust in domain legitimacy, which is a security consideration.

Recommendations

  1. Publish clear and comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to enhance GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add explicit security headers such as X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen browser security.
  3. Implement and publicize an incident response policy and provide security contact channels (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails).
  4. Create and host a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve security transparency.
  5. Verify and update domain WHOIS information to ensure domain registration legitimacy and improve trustworthiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Inddigo
Description
La société à mission Inddigo accompagne depuis plus de 35 ans la transition écologique des acteurs publics et privés, de la stratégie à la mise en œuvre, grâce à la diversité de ses domaines d’activités et à une approche systémique pour répondre aux enjeux complexes des territoires. Entreprise de conviction, indépendante et innovante, Inddigo regroupe plus de 400 collaborateurs dans 16 implantations en France métropolitaine et dans les Caraïbes.
Key services
Consulting, Engineering, Training, Innovation, Sustainability strategy
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Yoast SEO, WP Rocket, EWWW Image Optimizer
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Lazy loading scripts and images
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No obvious vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in French language
  2. Strong focus on ecological transition consulting and training
  3. No privacy or cookie policy pages explicitly found in the HTML content
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the visible content
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies found
  6. Uses modern WordPress plugins and optimizations for performance and SEO
  7. No signs of malicious or suspicious content
  8. WHOIS data missing, which is a concern for domain legitimacy verification
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with modern plugins including Yoast SEO for search optimization and WP Rocket for caching and performance. It uses jQuery and EWWW Image Optimizer for enhanced user experience and image handling. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible with good semantic HTML structure. Performance is fast due to lazy loading and preloading strategies. However, some CSP violations indicate potential script loading issues that should be addressed. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from improved security header configurations and domain registration verification.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with inddigo.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review inddigo.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.