Skip to main content

Security report for indapass.hu

Media Future Zrt. · Media · Hungary

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Indapass.hu is a Hungarian digital identity and single sign-on platform operated by Media Future Zrt., founded in 2018. It provides users with a unified login experience across multiple affiliated media portals such as Index.hu, Blog.hu, Velvet.hu, and others. The platform simplifies user management by consolidating access credentials and personal profiles, targeting general internet users in Hungary who consume media content from these portals. The business model centers on digital authentication integrated with media services, positioning Indapass as a key enabler in the Hungarian online media ecosystem. Technically, the website employs a modern JavaScript stack including jQuery, Google Analytics, and Gemius for analytics and tracking, alongside InMobi's Consent Management Platform to ensure GDPR compliance. The site is mobile-optimized with good design quality and clear navigation, although accessibility features are basic. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and standard SEO practices. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS with excellent SSL configuration and uses IP anonymization in analytics to protect user privacy. Consent mechanisms for cookies and data processing are implemented, reflecting good GDPR adherence. However, the absence of explicit security headers and a published security policy or incident response contact reduces the overall security maturity. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Overall, Indapass.hu demonstrates a solid digital presence with good privacy compliance and a trustworthy business model. Strategic improvements in security policy transparency and technical security headers would enhance its security posture and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching indapass.hu

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
10
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Indapass operates as a centralized authentication service for a network of Hungarian media portals, providing a competitive advantage by reducing user friction across multiple sites. Its integration with popular portals like Index.hu and Blog.hu creates a strong partnership ecosystem. The business model leverages user identity management to support media consumption and engagement, potentially enabling targeted advertising and personalized content delivery. Growth indicators include the breadth of affiliated sites and the use of modern consent management tools. The company is positioned as an important player in the Hungarian digital media landscape, with a medium-sized operation under Media Future Zrt. Revenue streams likely include advertising and premium media services tied to authenticated users.

Security posture

The security posture of Indapass.hu is moderate to good. HTTPS is enforced site-wide with strong SSL configuration. The use of consent management platforms and anonymized analytics indicates awareness of privacy regulations. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No public security policy or incident response contacts were found, which limits transparency and readiness perception. No vulnerabilities or sensitive data leaks were detected in the analyzed content. Overall, the site follows good security practices but could improve in policy disclosure and technical header implementation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and provide incident response contact information to improve transparency and user trust.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate risks from external dependencies.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards and improve user experience for all users.
  5. Consider establishing a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Media Future Zrt.
Description
Indapass is a single sign-on service that allows users to manage multiple user accounts and personal profiles across various affiliated media portals and services. It simplifies user access by eliminating redundant registrations.
Key services
Single sign-on authentication, User profile management, Access to affiliated media portals
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery 3.3.1, Google Analytics, Gemius tracking, InMobi Consent Management Platform, Toastr notifications
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • IP anonymization in Google Analytics
  • Consent management for GDPR compliance
  • Secure login forms with POST method

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Gemius
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
InMobi
Tracking pixels
Gemius
Marketing tools
Gemius, InMobi CMP
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website provides a centralized login service for multiple Hungarian media portals.
  2. Strong GDPR compliance with consent management and privacy policies.
  3. Use of reputable analytics and ad networks with anonymization features.
  4. No exposed sensitive data or obvious security vulnerabilities detected.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact likely via web forms.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
  7. Good branding consistency and professional design.
  8. No adult or questionable content present.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of JavaScript libraries including jQuery 3.3.1, Toastr for notifications, and integrates multiple analytics and tracking services such as Google Analytics and Gemius. Consent management is handled by InMobi CMP compliant with TCF 2.2 standards. The site is structured with responsive design principles and includes meta viewport tags for mobile optimization. Performance is moderate with asynchronous script loading. No CMS or hosting provider details were explicitly detected. SEO is basic with standard meta tags but no structured data like JSON-LD or Open Graph tags were found. The site could benefit from improved accessibility and SEO enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with indapass.hu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review indapass.hu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.