Skip to main content

Security report for incident-prevention.com

Incident Prevention · Energy · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Incident Prevention is a well-established digital platform founded in 2003, dedicated to providing comprehensive safety resources for utility professionals. The website offers expert articles, podcasts, training materials, and hosts a prominent utility safety conference, positioning itself as a leading authority in the energy sector's safety domain. The platform targets utility safety and operations professionals, delivering valuable content to support best practices and professional growth. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including Yoast SEO, Google Analytics, and UIkit, ensuring good performance, mobile optimization, and SEO compliance. Security posture is solid with HTTPS, domain locking, and standard best practices, though DNSSEC is not enabled and no explicit security or incident response policies are published. Privacy and cookie policies are present with consent mechanisms, reflecting good privacy compliance. Overall, the website demonstrates high professionalism, trustworthiness, and content quality, with no detected adult or questionable content. Strategic recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, publishing security policies, and adding vulnerability disclosure information to enhance security transparency and trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching incident-prevention.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates as a content publishing and event hosting business model focused on utility safety. It leverages multiple content formats including articles, podcasts, webinars, and conferences to engage its target audience of utility safety and operations professionals. The platform maintains a strong market position as a premier resource in the energy safety sector, supported by a long domain history and consistent branding. Revenue streams likely include advertising, conference registrations, and sponsored content. The partnership ecosystem includes related domains such as utilitysafetyconference.com and ip-institute.com, which support complementary services and events. The business exhibits growth indicators through active content updates, social media engagement, and educational offerings. The absence of direct contact information on the homepage suggests a focus on content consumption and event participation rather than direct sales or support.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and domain registration locked with multiple EPP status flags to prevent unauthorized changes. The absence of DNSSEC is a minor gap that could be addressed to improve DNS security. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analyzed content. However, the site lacks published security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, which are important for transparency and preparedness. The use of third-party analytics and advertising scripts introduces moderate user tracking, but privacy compliance is supported by cookie consent banners and a comprehensive privacy policy. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by publishing explicit security and incident response information and enabling DNSSEC.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response information to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Implement a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Consider adding clear contact information for security and general inquiries to enhance trust and communication.
  5. Regularly review third-party scripts and advertising tools to minimize privacy risks and ensure compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Incident Prevention
Description
Incident Prevention is a premier resource for utility safety, offering expert articles, podcasts, and training materials. It informs professionals on best practices and safety protocols and hosts the iP Utility Safety Conference & Expo for networking and professional growth.
Key services
Expert articles, Podcasts, Training materials, Utility safety conference & expo
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO Premium, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Advanced Ads, PublishPress Series Pro, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
UIkit, jQuery
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain locked with multiple EPP status flags
  • No DNSSEC (not enabled)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdSense, Advanced Ads
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO Premium
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional resource for utility safety professionals.
  2. Content includes articles, podcasts, webinars, and conference information.
  3. Strong social media presence on Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube.
  4. Uses WordPress CMS with modern SEO and analytics tools.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found on homepage content.
  6. Privacy and cookie policies are present with consent mechanisms.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  8. No terms of service page detected.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  10. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using a modern and well-supported tech stack including Yoast SEO Premium for search optimization, UIkit for frontend UI components, and Google Analytics and Tag Manager for traffic analysis. Hosting is supported by Cloudflare DNS services, providing DNS resilience and performance benefits. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and accessibility features, with a clean and professional design. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by multiple third-party scripts and advertising integrations. The technical implementation is robust with opportunities for improvement in DNS security and enhanced security transparency. No critical technical debt or vulnerabilities were identified in the provided content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with incident-prevention.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review incident-prevention.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.