Skip to main content

Security report for incentrev.com

incentRev · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

incentRev is a niche service provider specializing in helping broadcasters generate web-based revenue through custom promotional programs and consulting services. The company targets media stations of various sizes, offering tailored products such as the Half-Off Program and auctions to build new revenue streams. The website content is focused and relevant to its target audience, presenting a clear business model and market positioning within the media sector. Technically, the website uses older technologies such as jQuery 1.3.2 and Blueprint CSS, with Google Analytics for tracking. The site lacks modern mobile optimization and accessibility features, and no CMS or hosting provider details are evident. Performance is moderate, but the outdated tech stack and lack of visible HTTPS enforcement or security headers indicate technical debt and security risks. From a security perspective, the site does not show evidence of DNSSEC, security headers, or cookie consent mechanisms. The use of an outdated JavaScript library increases vulnerability risk. The WHOIS data shows a long-established domain with consistent registration details, supporting legitimacy. However, the absence of privacy compliance features and security best practices lowers the overall security posture. Overall, incentRev presents a moderately credible business with a focused service offering but requires improvements in technical modernization, security hardening, and privacy compliance to enhance trust and reduce risk.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching incentrev.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

incentRev operates in the media sector, focusing on broadcasters seeking to monetize their web presence. Its competitive advantage lies in its broadcaster-centric approach and custom-designed revenue programs with no setup cost. Revenue streams likely come from consulting fees and program participation. The target customers are broadcast stations ranging from small to large. The company has been active since 2006, indicating market experience. The partnership with halfoffhelp.com suggests an ecosystem for customer support. Growth indicators are limited from the website alone, but the niche focus and longevity imply stable operations. Strategic observations include the need to modernize technology and enhance digital marketing to expand reach.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is low to moderate. Key vulnerabilities include the use of an outdated jQuery version, lack of DNSSEC, absence of security headers, and no visible HTTPS enforcement. These issues expose the site to potential cross-site scripting and man-in-the-middle attacks. Compliance gaps exist due to missing cookie consent and limited privacy policy details regarding GDPR. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not evident. Data protection practices appear minimal, with no dedicated security or incident contacts. The business impact of these vulnerabilities could include reputational damage and regulatory risks if personal data is mishandled.

Recommendations

  1. Enable and enforce HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS.
  2. Update all JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to supported secure versions to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  3. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Add a cookie consent banner and update privacy policy to reflect GDPR compliance and data handling practices.
  5. Establish a documented security policy and incident response plan with clear contact channels for security issues.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
incentRev
Description
incentRev provides web-based revenue generation programs tailored for broadcasters, helping them develop ongoing promotions and new web/non-traditional revenue streams. The company offers custom-designed products with no setup cost, targeting broadcast stations of various sizes.
Key services
Custom web revenue programs, Consulting for broadcasters, Half-Off Program, Auctions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.3.2, Google Analytics (ga.js)
Frameworks
Blueprint CSS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
45/100
Good practices seen
  • Client login form uses POST method

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is focused on media broadcasters with clear business intent.
  3. No privacy or cookie consent banners detected.
  4. Outdated JavaScript library usage presents security risk.
  5. No visible security headers or HTTPS enforcement details available.
  6. WHOIS data shows a long-established domain with consistent registration.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses legacy technologies including jQuery 1.3.2 and Blueprint CSS, indicating technical debt. The presence of Google Analytics shows basic user tracking but lacks modern privacy controls. The site lacks mobile optimization and accessibility features, limiting user experience on diverse devices. Hosting details are unclear, but DNS servers point to cumulus.com. Performance is moderate but could be improved with modern frameworks and responsive design. The absence of CMS suggests a custom or static site architecture. Technical risks include outdated libraries and missing security configurations that could impact business continuity.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with incentrev.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review incentrev.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.