Skip to main content

Security report for incare.cz

Medicon a.s. · Healthcare · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Network security.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

INCARE is a premium healthcare service provider operating under the Medicon a.s. group, offering a wide range of specialized medical services including annual care, preventive packages, physiotherapy, and psychotherapy. The website targets both individual clients and corporate customers seeking high-quality healthcare with minimal waiting times. The company positions itself strongly in the Czech healthcare market with over 40 specializations and a large team of medical experts. Technically, the website is built on a custom CMS (Tom Atom) and employs a modern technology stack including Bootstrap, jQuery, Google Analytics, and Hotjar for analytics and user experience enhancement. The site is mobile-optimized and provides clear navigation and professional design. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and implements cookie consent and reCAPTCHA, but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies. WHOIS data is unavailable, which reduces transparency and trust slightly. Overall, the website is professional, secure, and compliant with privacy regulations, but could improve in security policy transparency and WHOIS data availability.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching incare.cz

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
80
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

INCARE operates in the healthcare sector as a medium-sized entity under the Medicon a.s. group. Its business model focuses on premium healthcare services with a strong emphasis on customer experience, offering comprehensive medical care packages for individuals and companies. The company leverages its extensive network of specialists and advanced technological infrastructure to maintain a competitive advantage. Revenue streams likely include subscription-based annual care programs, preventive health packages, and corporate healthcare contracts. The website's partnership with Medicon a.s. strengthens its market credibility. The company maintains active social media channels and uses modern marketing and analytics tools to engage customers and optimize service delivery. Growth indicators include a broad service portfolio and a professional online presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with mandatory HTTPS encryption, cookie consent mechanisms, and Google reCAPTCHA integration to prevent automated abuse. However, it lacks explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published, which could hinder timely security issue reporting and resolution. The absence of WHOIS data reduces transparency and trustworthiness from a domain registration perspective. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but could be enhanced by publishing security policies, implementing additional HTTP security headers, and providing clear incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen web security.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Regularly update third-party libraries and frameworks to their latest secure versions to reduce vulnerability risks.
  4. Improve WHOIS transparency by ensuring domain registration data is publicly accessible or justified if privacy protected.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Medicon a.s.
Description
INCARE nabízí nadstandardní zdravotní programy pro ty, kteří si přejí vyšší standard zdravotní péče. S krátkými čekacími a objednávacími dobami.
Key services
Annual care, Preventive packages, Physiotherapy, Psychotherapy, Corporate healthcare services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 2.2.4, Bootstrap 3.3.7, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Hotjar, FancyBox, YouTube Background plugin, Masonry layout, CookieConsent v2.7.2, Google reCAPTCHA
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA implemented
  • Cookie consent mechanism present
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Hotjar
Marketing tools
Google Ads, Hotjar
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual and reduces transparency.
  3. Website uses HTTPS and modern tracking and analytics tools.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented and linked to a parent company domain.
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response information is published.
  6. Contact information is clearly provided with phone and email.
  7. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram is active.
  8. Website content is healthcare-focused, safe, and professional.
  9. Technical stack is modern but uses older jQuery and Bootstrap versions.
  10. No signs of suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a custom CMS platform called Tom Atom and uses a combination of Bootstrap 3.3.7 and jQuery 2.2.4, which are somewhat dated but still functional. It integrates multiple third-party services including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Hotjar, and YouTube embeds for video content. The site is mobile responsive and uses modern CSS and JavaScript libraries for UI components and cookie consent management. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected, though updating to newer versions of frameworks could improve speed and security. The site lacks some advanced accessibility features but maintains good SEO practices with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but has room for modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with incare.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review incare.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.