Skip to main content

Security report for inbalancegrid.com

In Balance grid, UAB · Energy · Lithuania

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

In Balance grid, UAB operates a professional website focused on providing comprehensive EV charging infrastructure solutions in the Baltics and Central-Eastern Europe. The company offers hardware, software, and 24/7 operational services, positioning itself as a leading regional EV network operator. The website demonstrates a solid digital presence with multilingual support, social media integration, and detailed cookie consent mechanisms, reflecting a mature technical infrastructure. However, the absence of WHOIS domain registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and ownership transparency. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS usage and cookie consent but lacks visible security headers and published privacy policies. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching inbalancegrid.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
60
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets EV drivers and businesses requiring EV charging solutions, leveraging a business model that integrates hardware sales, software services, and operational support. Their market position as a major regional operator is supported by client logos and a clear value proposition. The use of WordPress with SEO and analytics tools indicates a focus on digital marketing and customer engagement. The lack of explicit contact details and privacy policies suggests areas for improvement in customer trust and regulatory compliance. Partnerships appear regional with a Lithuanian domain variant. Growth potential is indicated by the comprehensive service offering and regional market focus.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and cookie consent tools, indicating baseline security awareness. However, no security headers were detected, and no explicit privacy or incident response policies are published. The absence of WHOIS data and security.txt files limits transparency and incident handling readiness. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics and Cookiebot is standard but requires ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be significantly improved by publishing clear policies, implementing security headers, and establishing vulnerability disclosure mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the homepage.
  2. Implement and verify HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Establish and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and incident response.
  4. Verify and disclose domain registration details to improve trust and legitimacy perception.
  5. Provide clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers for customer and security inquiries.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
In Balance grid, UAB
Description
We are Inbalance. The all-in-one EV charging solution. Our solution has it all. And it works like a charm.
Key services
EV charging stations, EV charging software, 24/7 operations, Cloud balancing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, Yoast SEO plugin, jQuery 3.7.1, Cookiebot for cookie consent, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Site Kit by Google, Sitepress Multilingual CMS (WPML)
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied by canonical and script URLs
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data found in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is focused on EV charging infrastructure and related software.
  3. Cookie consent is implemented with detailed cookie categories and controls.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in provided content.
  5. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the visible content.
  6. Social media links are present and consistent with company branding.
  7. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, raising some legitimacy concerns.
  8. Website uses modern WordPress CMS with common plugins and Google Analytics.
  9. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  10. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2 with popular plugins including Yoast SEO, WPML for multilingual support, and Google Site Kit for analytics integration. It uses jQuery 3.7.1 and Cookiebot for cookie management. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile responsiveness. SEO practices are good with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD) describing the organization and webpage. No hosting provider information was detected. The site could improve accessibility features and implement additional security controls. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and functional but has room for security and compliance enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with inbalancegrid.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review inbalancegrid.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.