Skip to main content

Security report for imlive.com

Moniker Online Services LLC · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ImLive.com is a well-established adult webcam platform founded in 2001, offering live streaming services featuring cam girls, men, and trans hosts across a wide range of categories and fetishes. The platform targets adult users seeking interactive adult entertainment with features such as private chats, prepaid sessions, and interactive toys. The business model is primarily subscription and pay-per-minute based, positioning ImLive as a significant player in the adult media industry. Technically, the website employs a moderate tech stack including jQuery, Google Tag Manager, and custom scripts, hosted on Amazon AWS infrastructure, ensuring reasonable performance and scalability. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and categorization. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and includes some security best practices like two-factor authentication UI and domain transfer protection. However, it lacks explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and does not publish a security policy or incident response contacts, which are areas for improvement. Privacy compliance is basic, with no visible cookie consent mechanism or GDPR indicators, which could pose regulatory risks. Overall, ImLive.com demonstrates a mature and credible business presence with room to enhance its security and privacy posture to meet modern standards.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching imlive.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ImLive.com operates in the adult media sector, leveraging a large and diverse host base to cater to various customer preferences. Its extensive categorization and filtering options indicate a focus on personalized user experiences. The platform's longevity and domain age suggest stable market positioning and brand recognition. Revenue streams include live streaming fees, prepaid sessions, and discount club memberships. The presence of social media links and multi-language support reflects efforts to engage a global audience. However, the absence of explicit contact information and security policies may limit transparency and customer trust. The business could benefit from formalizing partnerships and publishing more comprehensive corporate information to strengthen credibility.

Security posture

The website maintains a good baseline security posture with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protection in place. The presence of two-factor authentication UI indicates awareness of account security. However, the lack of critical security headers like Content-Security-Policy and absence of a published security policy or incident response contacts represent gaps in security maturity. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms were found, limiting external security collaboration. Privacy compliance is minimal, with no cookie consent banners or GDPR compliance indicators, which could expose the business to regulatory scrutiny. Recommendations include implementing CSP headers, publishing security and privacy policies, and establishing clear incident response channels to enhance security culture and resilience.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a comprehensive Content-Security-Policy header to mitigate cross-site scripting risks.
  2. Add explicit cookie consent mechanisms and privacy notices to improve GDPR compliance.
  3. Publish a detailed security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Introduce a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure program to engage with security researchers.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user inclusivity.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Moniker Online Services LLC
Description
ImLive.com offers live webcam experiences featuring cam girls, men, and trans hosts with various categories and fetishes. The platform targets adult users seeking live adult entertainment and interactive video chat services.
Key services
Live webcam streaming, Private chat sessions, Interactive toy integration, Prepaid sessions, Discount club memberships
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 2.1.1, Google Tag Manager, Google Identity Services, Stormcaster.js (custom script), ClickTail.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Two-factor authentication UI present

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, ClickTail
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
ClickTail
Marketing tools
Google Analytics (implied by GTM), ClickTail
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a mature adult webcam platform with extensive categorization and filtering options.
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie consent banners detected, which may impact GDPR compliance.
  3. Security features like 2FA UI are present but no published security policy or incident response contacts.
  4. Use of modern tracking and analytics tools without full transparency on data retention or privacy.
  5. No visible contact emails or phone numbers for business or security inquiries.
  6. Website uses HTTPS and AWS hosting with multiple DNS servers for resilience.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a moderately modern technology stack centered around jQuery 2.1.1 and Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking. Hosting is provided by Amazon AWS, indicated by the DNS servers, ensuring reliable infrastructure. The site includes custom JavaScript for interactive features and uses Google Identity Services for authentication. Performance is moderate with some optimization for mobile devices. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation. However, the absence of a CMS or modern frontend frameworks suggests potential technical debt. Opportunities exist to modernize the tech stack, improve performance, and enhance security headers to reduce risks and improve maintainability.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with imlive.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review imlive.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.