Security report for imf.org
International Monetary Fund · Finance · United States
The International Monetary Fund (IMF) is a globally recognized international organization dedicated to fostering global monetary cooperation, securing financial stability, facilitating international trade, promoting high employment and sustainable economic growth, and reducing poverty around the world. The website www.imf.org serves as the official digital presence of the IMF, providing comprehensive resources including research, data, publications, news, and capacity development services to its 191 member countries and the global community. The site is well-branded, professionally designed, and offers extensive navigation and content relevant to policymakers, researchers, journalists, and the public. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including JavaScript frameworks, analytics tools, and a Sitecore CMS backend. It integrates advanced search capabilities via Coveo and uses multiple analytics and tracking services such as Google Analytics, Adobe DTM, and Verint Unified WebSDK. The site is mobile optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices. However, some security best practices such as explicit security headers and cookie consent mechanisms could be improved. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and does not expose sensitive data in its HTML content. It provides accountability resources such as an integrity hotline and an independent evaluation office. The WHOIS data is unavailable or malformed, likely due to privacy protection, but this is consistent with the nature of the organization and does not detract from the site's legitimacy. No signs of malware, phishing, or vulnerabilities were detected. Overall, the IMF website demonstrates a high level of professionalism, trustworthiness, and compliance with privacy regulations. It effectively serves its role as a key information and resource hub for international finance and economic policy. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, implementing cookie consent, and publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy to further strengthen its security posture and transparency.
Scanned
NIS2 and GDPR posture
- GDPR outside view
- 58/ 100 · Medium
- Checks completed
- 6of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
- (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
- (b) Incident handling: One indicator
- (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
- (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
- (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
- (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
- (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
- (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
- (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
- (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
SSL/TLS
TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.
- Critical
Unable to retrieve SSL certificate
Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information
What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured
- Critical
GDPR outside view
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
- High
No Cookie Policy found
GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes
- High
No Cookie Consent Banner found
GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit
- GDPR Art. 7
- ePrivacy Art. 5(3)
- NIST PT-4: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 PT-4: Consent
- High
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
Keep watching imf.org
This scan found 14 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended€25per month
- TLS certificates and expiry
- DNS records
- SPF, DKIM and DMARC
- Security headers
- GDPR and NIS2 posture
- Exposed services
- Third-party trackers
- Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.
Full report
€39.90one-time
- The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
- Email delivery with an unlock code
- Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
- SSL/TLS
- 0
- Email security
- 75
- DNS health
- 75
- Network security
- 100
- GDPR outside view
- 58
- Average
- 62
Not counted
- Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
- NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
- OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
- The certificate is not trusted by browsers
- The website is not served over HTTPS
- A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
- The page loads a script from a compromised source
- The domain registration has expired
- SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
- Critical0–25
- High26–49
- Medium50–75
- Low76–100
Technical appendix
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
Security posture
Recommendations
- Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
- Deploy a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
- Publish a clear vulnerability disclosure policy and provide dedicated security contact information.
- Enhance transparency by detailing incident response procedures and data retention policies.
- Regularly audit third-party scripts and analytics tools to minimize privacy risks and improve performance.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
- Company
- International Monetary Fund
- Description
- The International Monetary Fund (IMF) works to achieve sustainable growth and prosperity for all of its 191 member countries by supporting economic policies that promote financial stability and monetary cooperation.
- Key services
- Economic surveillance, Financial assistance and lending, Capacity development and training, Research and publications, Data provision and analysis
- Content quality
- excellent
- Branding
- consistent
Technology
- Stack
- JavaScript, jQuery 3.5.1, Coveo Search UI, Adobe Dynamic Tag Management, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Verint Unified WebSDK, Featherlight Gallery, Bootstrap 5.1.3
- Performance
- moderate
- Mobile
- good
- Accessibility
- good
- SEO
- good
Security
- Observed score
- 85/100
- Good practices seen
- HTTPS enforced
- No exposed sensitive data in HTML
- Use of integrity hotline and accountability links
Analytics and tracking
- Services
- Google Analytics, Adobe DTM, Coveo Analytics, Verint Unified WebSDK, Parsely
- Tracking level
- moderate
- Privacy practices
- good
Advertising
- Ad networks
- ShareThis
- Tracking pixels
- Adobe DTM, Coveo Analytics, Verint Unified WebSDK, Parsely
- Marketing tools
- Adobe Dynamic Tag Management, ShareThis
- Transparency
- good
Site quality
- Design
- excellent
- User experience
- excellent
- Content relevance
- excellent
- Navigation
- excellent
- Professionalism
- excellent
- Trustworthiness
- high
Key observations
- Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
- Strong branding consistent with International Monetary Fund identity.
- Comprehensive navigation with multiple sections covering About, Research, Countries, Capacity Development, News, Videos, Data, and Publications.
- Multiple social media channels linked with verified accounts.
- Use of modern JavaScript libraries and analytics tools.
- No signs of adult or inappropriate content.
- No visible security headers in HTML but HTTPS is enforced.
- WHOIS data is unavailable or malformed, likely due to privacy protection or query issues.
- No explicit cookie consent mechanism detected.
- Presence of an integrity hotline and accountability resources.
Technical notes
Notes
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
- MITRE CWE (opens in a new tab)4.20 (2026-04-30) · CWE Terms of Use (free use with attribution, © MITRE)
- OWASP Top 10:2025 (opens in a new tab)2025 (membership per CWE 4.20) · CC BY-SA 4.0
- MITRE CAPEC (opens in a new tab)3.9 (2023-01-24) · CAPEC Terms of Use (free use with attribution, © MITRE)
- OWASP ASVS (opens in a new tab)5.0.0 · CC BY-SA 4.0
- OWASP Web Security Testing Guide (opens in a new tab)latest (checklist.json, master) · CC BY-SA 4.0
- OWASP Secure Headers Project (opens in a new tab)2026-10-18 · Apache-2.0
- Mozilla Server Side TLS (intermediate) (opens in a new tab)6.0 · MPL-2.0
- NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 (OSCAL catalog) (opens in a new tab)5.2.0 · Public domain (US Government work)
- Directive (EU) 2022/2555 (NIS2) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 333, 27.12.2022 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 (opens in a new tab)OJ L, 18.10.2024 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 119, 4.5.2016 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Directive 2002/58/EC (ePrivacy), consolidated (opens in a new tab)19.12.2009 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- RFC Editor metadata (opens in a new tab)per-RFC (obsolete RFCs rejected) · IETF Trust Legal Provisions (metadata only)
- NIST CSRC, W3C TR, IETF Datatracker, EDPB, EUR-Lex CELLAR and gesetze-bayern.de (opens in a new tab)per document · Titles and links only
- NIST NVD CVE API 2.0 (opens in a new tab)live records · Public domain (NVD); CVE® records © MITRE, free use
- W3C WCAG 2.2 (opens in a new tab)W3C Recommendation (wcag.json) · W3C Software and Document License
- ETSI EN 301 549 (opens in a new tab)V3.2.1 (2021-03), clause headings · Clause numbers and titles only (© ETSI)
- Directive (EU) 2019/882 (European Accessibility Act) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 151, 7.6.2019 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Directive (EU) 2016/2102 (Web Accessibility Directive) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 327, 2.12.2016 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Earlier scans of this domain
- 79/100Low19 findingsView report
Feedback on this report
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with imf.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review imf.org.