Skip to main content

Security report for imaps-capital.com

iMaps ETI AG · Finance · Switzerland

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and Network security.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

iMaps ETI AG is a Swiss-based financial services company specializing in the creation and issuance of Exchange Traded Instruments (ETIs), including Actively Managed Certificates (AMCs) and Fund-Linked Notes. The company targets financial institutions, asset managers, and investors seeking innovative investment products in the European market. Founded in 2018, iMaps ETI AG positions itself as a niche player offering white label solutions and a proprietary issuance platform to streamline ETI creation. The website infrastructure is built on WordPress with Elementor and Astra theme, leveraging modern web technologies and integrating marketing and analytics tools such as HubSpot and Google Ads. The site is multilingual, GDPR compliant, and features cookie consent mechanisms, reflecting a mature digital presence. Performance and mobile optimization are good, though some accessibility features could be enhanced. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, but there is room for improvement by enabling DNSSEC, adding security headers, and publishing formal security policies and incident response contacts. No critical security issues were detected. The WHOIS data aligns well with the business profile, indicating legitimacy and consistent domain registration. Overall, iMaps ETI AG demonstrates a professional and trustworthy online presence suitable for its financial services business, with recommendations to strengthen security transparency and technical safeguards to further enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching imaps-capital.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
95
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the finance sector, focusing on innovative investment products like AMCs and Fund-Linked Notes. Its business model revolves around product issuance and white label services, catering primarily to institutional clients in Europe. The multilingual website and social media presence indicate an international outreach strategy. The use of HubSpot for marketing and analytics suggests a data-driven approach to customer engagement. The domain age and registration details support a stable business history. However, the absence of explicit contact emails and phone numbers on the website may limit direct client engagement. The company could benefit from publishing more detailed business and security policies to reinforce credibility.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Cloudflare DNS, providing a baseline of security. Cookie consent and privacy policies comply with GDPR, indicating attention to data protection regulations. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and several recommended security headers are missing, which could expose the site to certain attack vectors. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy is present, limiting transparency for security researchers. No incident response contacts or security policies are published, which could delay response to security incidents. Overall, the security posture is good but can be improved by implementing additional security controls and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and verify security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Add a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party plugins and scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
iMaps ETI AG
Description
We build and issue a new generation of Exchange Traded Instruments (ETIs): Actively Managed Certificates (AMCs) or Fund-Linked Notes.
Key services
Actively Managed Certificates, Fund Linked Notes, White Label Services, Issuance Platform
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Astra Theme, Yoast SEO, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
WordPress CMS
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
HubSpot Analytics, Google Ads Conversion Tracking
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Ads (gtag.js)
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured
  2. Multilingual support with language switcher for EN, DE, FR, IT, ES
  3. Cookie consent and privacy policy comply with GDPR
  4. Use of HubSpot and Google Ads for marketing and analytics
  5. No visible security policy or incident response information
  6. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers publicly listed, only contact form
  7. No terms of service page found
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
  9. DNSSEC not enabled, which is a minor security gap
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using the Astra theme and Elementor page builder, which supports responsive design and good SEO practices. Integration with HubSpot and Google Ads indicates a mature marketing infrastructure. The site uses Cloudflare for DNS but does not have DNSSEC enabled, representing a minor security gap. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. Accessibility features are basic and could be enhanced. The site includes structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO and social media integration. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business needs but could benefit from additional security and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with imaps-capital.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review imaps-capital.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.