Skip to main content

Security report for imantas.lv

Imantas SIA · Hospitality · Latvia

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

47/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Imantas SIA operates a hospitality and wellness center located in Jūrkalne, Latvia, offering accommodation in guest houses, cottages, and camping sites, alongside restaurant and bar services. The business targets travelers and tourists seeking relaxation near the Jūrkalnes stāvkrasts. The website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including Bootstrap, jQuery, and various UI libraries, providing a good user experience with mobile optimization and clear navigation. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacking important security headers and explicit privacy compliance measures. Contact information is clearly presented, though no direct email addresses are visible. Overall, the site reflects a legitimate small hospitality business with room for improvement in security and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching imantas.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
55
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
10
Average
47

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a local hospitality provider in Latvia's Kurzeme region, focusing on accommodation and leisure services. Its business model relies on direct bookings and on-site services such as dining and wellness. The website supports multilingual access, enhancing reach to international tourists. Social media integration and customer testimonials contribute to trust and marketing. The absence of detailed compliance and security policies suggests an opportunity to strengthen regulatory adherence and customer trust. The company appears to be a small-sized entity with a focused regional market presence.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and uses form validation and third-party analytics tools like Google Analytics and Facebook SDK. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and HSTS, which could expose it to certain web-based attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, indicating limited security maturity. The absence of visible email contacts and security policies may hinder effective communication in case of security incidents. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could benefit from enhanced headers, documented policies, and improved privacy compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to improve protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish clear privacy, security, and terms of service policies to enhance compliance and user trust.
  3. Add visible company contact emails for support and incident reporting to facilitate communication.
  4. Review and audit third-party scripts and plugins regularly to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider establishing a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to improve transparency and security culture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Imantas SIA
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Imantas SIA
Description
Atpūtas un veselības centrs “Imantas” piedāvā rehabilitāciju un atpūtu Kurzemes piekrastē - Jūrkalnes stāvkrastā. Piedāvā nakšņošanu viesu namā, kempinga kotedžās, restorānu ar vīnu, alu un gardu ēdienu.
Key services
Guest house accommodation, Cottages rental, Camping sites, Restaurant and bar services, Wellness and rehabilitation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap 4.5, Slick Carousel, Lightbox2, Fancybox, Google Maps API, Google Analytics, Facebook SDK
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA alternative (Facebook SDK)
  • Form validation via jQuery Validate

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook SDK
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook SDK
Marketing tools
Facebook SDK
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in Latvian with multilingual support (English, Russian).
  3. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and libraries.
  4. Includes cookie consent banner and privacy policy link.
  5. No explicit security headers detected; HTTPS is enabled.
  6. Contact information is clear with phone and physical address.
  7. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram.
  8. No visible email addresses in HTML content.
  9. Forms use AJAX with validation but no visible CAPTCHA.
  10. No terms of service or security policy pages found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2 with a combination of popular frontend libraries such as Bootstrap 4.5, jQuery, Slick Carousel, Lightbox2, and Fancybox. It integrates Google Maps API and social media SDKs for enhanced user engagement. The site is mobile responsive and uses AJAX for form submissions with client-side validation. Performance is moderate with multiple external CDN dependencies. No advanced hosting or infrastructure details are evident. The technical stack is modern but could be improved with better security configurations and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with imantas.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review imantas.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.