Skip to main content

Security report for imageprofessionals.com

Image Professionals GmbH · Media · Germany

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Image Professionals GmbH operates a specialized premium content platform aggregating leading international specialist image agencies. Their business model focuses on providing curated, expert-verified image and video content primarily targeting media professionals and image buyers. The company maintains a medium-sized operation based in Germany with a strong market position in niche image licensing. Technically, the website employs a modern tech stack including React and jQuery, with Matomo analytics configured to disable cookies, reflecting privacy-conscious design. The site is mobile-optimized and professionally designed, offering a good user experience and clear navigation. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though security headers are not detected and cookie consent mechanisms are absent, indicating areas for improvement. The WHOIS data is missing or inaccessible, which raises some legitimacy concerns despite the professional web presence. Overall, the site scores well on content quality and business credibility but should address privacy and security policy disclosures to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching imageprofessionals.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
25
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention imageprofessionals.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
5
Employees
0
Customers
5
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for imageprofessionals.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company leverages a network of partner agencies and brands to offer a broad portfolio of specialized image content, differentiating itself from mainstream stock photo providers. Their custom pricing and editorial services suggest a B2B focus with tailored solutions. The presence of multiple partner domains and a dedicated ArtShop indicates diversified revenue streams. The company’s social media presence and structured data enhance SEO and brand visibility. The lack of WHOIS transparency is a notable anomaly but may be due to privacy protection or registry issues. The business appears stable with a clear niche and professional market positioning.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and use of privacy-respecting analytics. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No incident response or security policy information is published, which limits transparency and preparedness perception. The lack of a cookie consent mechanism may expose the company to GDPR compliance risks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Overall, security practices are adequate but could be significantly improved with standard headers and policy disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to harden the website against common attacks.
  2. Add a visible cookie consent banner/mechanism to ensure GDPR compliance and user transparency regarding tracking.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve trust and readiness.
  4. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data issue to enhance domain legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve inclusivity and meet modern web standards.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Image Professionals GmbH
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Image Professionals GmbH
Description
Image Professionals unites leading international specialist image agencies under one roof, focusing on specialized premium content in food, living, beauty, garden, travel, medicine & science.
Key services
Image and video licensing, Custom image and video production, Editorial services, Database solutions, ArtShop for printed images
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, React 15.4.0, Slick Carousel, Matomo Analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Matomo analytics with cookies disabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Matomo Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Professional and consistent branding with multiple specialized image agencies
  3. Comprehensive structured data for SEO and business info
  4. No visible security headers detected in provided data
  5. No cookie consent mechanism visible despite GDPR relevance
  6. WHOIS data missing or inaccessible, raising some legitimacy concerns
  7. Matomo analytics used with cookies disabled, indicating privacy awareness
  8. Multiple external partner domains linked and referenced
  9. No adult or questionable content detected
  10. Forms present include login and search with standard fields
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of React 15.4.0 and jQuery libraries, along with the Slick carousel for UI elements. Matomo analytics is integrated with cookies disabled, reflecting a privacy-aware approach. The site is served over HTTPS with a valid SSL configuration. The HTML structure is modern and includes JSON-LD structured data for SEO and business information. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization. Mobile responsiveness is good, though accessibility features are basic and could be improved. No CMS is explicitly detected. Hosting provider details are not available from the provided data. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with imageprofessionals.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review imageprofessionals.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.