Skip to main content

Security report for iklandisini.com

Iklandisini.com · Media · Indonesia

Partial score · DNS & email only

70/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Iklandisini.com is a self-service advertising platform targeting Indonesian businesses seeking affordable and flexible advertising solutions across digital, social media, video, and TV media. The platform is positioned as an accessible and easy-to-use service for small business owners to manage their own ad campaigns. Technically, the website employs modern frontend technologies including Bootstrap, jQuery, Splide.js, and Owl Carousel, with integration of Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking. The site is mobile-optimized and presents a professional design with clear navigation. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration but lacks security headers and cookie consent mechanisms, which are important for compliance and protection. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a significant concern, impacting trust and legitimacy. Overall, the site is functional and professional but requires improvements in privacy compliance and domain registration transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching iklandisini.com

This scan found 16 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
70

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention iklandisini.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for iklandisini.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the media sector, focusing on digital advertising services for small businesses in Indonesia. Its business model is based on self-service ad placements with multiple ad formats including display banners, advertorials, social media ads, video, and TV display ads. The platform is a subsidiary of Arkadia Digital Media, indicating some corporate backing. The target market is local Indonesian SMEs seeking cost-effective advertising. The company leverages WhatsApp as a primary contact channel, reflecting local communication preferences. The lack of detailed company registration and contact information online limits transparency. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its ease of use and affordable pricing starting from Rp 50,000. Growth potential depends on expanding media partnerships and enhancing trust signals.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enforced and no visible exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No incident response or security policy pages are published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. Privacy compliance is basic, lacking cookie consent mechanisms despite use of tracking scripts. The missing WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain legitimacy and potential risk. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires enhancements in headers, privacy compliance, and transparency to improve trust and reduce risk.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to comply with privacy regulations and improve user transparency.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to demonstrate security governance and readiness.
  4. Register the domain with transparent WHOIS information to improve legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting and improve security culture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Iklandisini.com
Description
Iklandisini.com merupakan platform pemasangan iklan mandiri (self-service adplatform) yang ditujukan bagi para pemilik usaha untuk memasarkan produk dan jasanya di media jaringan seluruh Indonesia. Para pemilik usaha dapat memasang iklan dengan mudah dan terjangkau di media digital, media cetak, maupun akun sosial media.
Key services
Display Banner Advertising, Advertorial Advertising, Social Media Advertising, Video Advertising, Display TV Advertising
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, jQuery, Splide.js, Owl Carousel, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no WAF or blocking detected
  2. Content is primarily in Indonesian language targeting Indonesian businesses
  3. No visible contact emails or physical addresses found; only WhatsApp phone contact
  4. No cookie consent mechanism present despite use of tracking scripts
  5. WHOIS data is missing, which is a critical trust and legitimacy issue
  6. Website uses modern frontend libraries and frameworks
  7. Security headers are not detected in the provided data
  8. Privacy policy and terms of service pages exist but are basic
  9. No explicit security or incident response policies published
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern frontend stack with Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for DOM manipulation, and Splide.js and Owl Carousel for interactive sliders and carousels. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are integrated for analytics and marketing tracking. The site loads external CSS and JS assets from its own domain, indicating self-hosting or dedicated hosting. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design and viewport meta tags. Accessibility features are basic with some semantic HTML but no ARIA roles or advanced accessibility aids detected. SEO optimization is basic with meta tags and Open Graph tags but no structured data (JSON-LD) found. No CMS or hosting provider information is detected from the source. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and SEO improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with iklandisini.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review iklandisini.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.