IGT – Institut für Gebäudetechnologie GmbH · Energy · Germany
Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and Network security.
IGT – Institut für Gebäudetechnologie GmbH is an independent German institute specializing in consulting, training, and lectures focused on modern building technology, smart buildings, energy efficiency, and e-mobility. The company targets professionals and organizations seeking expertise in these areas, offering tailored services including inhouse and web-based training. Their market position is that of a niche expert institute with a clear focus on innovative building solutions. Technically, the website is built on WordPress 6.2.8, utilizing Bootstrap for responsive design and common plugins such as Contact Form 7 and Matomo for privacy-conscious analytics. Hosting is provided by rzone.de, a German hosting provider, and the site employs HTTPS with a good SSL configuration. The site demonstrates moderate performance and good mobile optimization, with basic accessibility features and solid SEO practices. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and includes a GDPR-compliant cookie consent banner. However, no explicit security headers were detected in the provided data, and there is no published security policy or incident response contact. The use of Matomo analytics indicates a privacy-aware approach. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with privacy regulations, though it could improve its security posture by implementing additional HTTP security headers and publishing security-related policies. The business information is clear and consistent with the domain registration data, supporting a legitimacy score of 80 out of 100.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
Prevents clickjacking attacks
What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"
Controls resources the browser is allowed to load
What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application
Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.
Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer
What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention igt-institut.de, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for igt-institut.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with igt-institut.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review igt-institut.de.