Skip to main content

Security report for igsyd.dk

Ingeniørgruppen Syd · Energy · Denmark

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ingeniørgruppen Syd is a Danish consulting engineering firm established in 2002, specializing in a broad range of construction and installation consulting services including energy management, building consulting, and alternative energy solutions. The company targets public and private building owners and developers, offering expertise in planning, design, supervision, and energy consultancy. Their market position is that of a well-established small business with a consistent brand presence and a professional website. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using common plugins and themes, with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented, but lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC. Privacy compliance is basic, with no explicit privacy or terms of service pages found. Business credibility is strong due to clear company identity, consistent branding, and a long domain history. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but could improve in security and privacy transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching igsyd.dk

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the energy and construction sectors, providing consulting engineering services primarily in Denmark. Their business model focuses on project-based consulting for new construction, renovations, and energy solutions. The website content and structure indicate a focus on public and private clients requiring engineering expertise. The firm leverages a WordPress-based digital presence with integrated marketing and analytics tools. Growth indicators include active news updates and project showcases. The LinkedIn presence supports professional networking. No evidence of parent or subsidiary companies was found. The company maintains a moderate digital maturity level with opportunities to enhance security and privacy disclosures.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and a cookie consent mechanism, indicating baseline security and privacy awareness. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces protection against common web attacks. DNSSEC is not enabled, which could improve DNS security. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, limiting transparency in security management. The use of common WordPress plugins necessitates regular updates to mitigate vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be strengthened with additional technical controls and policy disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  2. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to improve DNS security and trust.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  4. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to reduce vulnerability risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ingeniørgruppen Syd
Description
Ingeniørgruppen Syd is a consulting engineering firm specializing broadly in construction and installation areas. They focus on installation and energy consulting for public and private clients in new construction, renovations, and building improvements. The company has versatile experience in planning, design, supervision, and energy management consultancy. They are also authorized building experts.
Key services
Bygningsrådgivning (Building Consulting), VVS & Ventilation (Plumbing & Ventilation), Stærk- & Svagstrøm (Strong & Weak Current Electrical Systems), EDB & Telefon (IT & Telephone Systems), Indeklimaforhold (Indoor Climate Conditions - BSIM), Bygherrerådgivning (Client Consulting), Alternative Energianlæg (Alternative Energy Systems)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Google Analytics, Slick Slider, Contact Form 7, WPBakery Page Builder, Salient Theme
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich
  2. No explicit privacy or terms of service pages found
  3. Cookie consent banner present and functional
  4. Contact information primarily via contact form; no direct emails or phone numbers visible in HTML
  5. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and theme
  6. No advanced security headers detected
  7. Google Analytics and Tag Manager used for tracking
  8. Social media presence limited to LinkedIn link in footer
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Salient theme and common plugins such as Contact Form 7 and WPBakery Page Builder. It uses jQuery and Slick Slider for UI components and Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and moderate performance. No advanced hosting or CDN information was detected. The absence of DNSSEC and security headers indicates some technical debt in security best practices. The site structure and meta tags support good SEO. Accessibility features are basic but present. Overall, the technical infrastructure is standard for a small professional services website with room for modernization and security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with igsyd.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review igsyd.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.