Skip to main content

Security report for ignitis.lt

UAB Ignitis · Energy · Lithuania

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

UAB Ignitis operates as the largest electricity and gas supplier in Lithuania, serving over 1.6 million customers nationwide. The company offers a broad range of energy services and positions itself as a provider of smart energy solutions. The website content is professionally presented in Lithuanian, targeting both residential and business customers within Lithuania. The business model focuses on energy supply and related services, with a strong market position as the leading energy provider in the country. Technically, the website is built on the Drupal CMS platform and integrates multiple modern technologies including Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot for cookie consent management, and various analytics and marketing tools such as Hotjar, Gemius, VWO, and MailerLite. The site is mobile-optimized and demonstrates good SEO and accessibility practices, although some accessibility features could be enhanced. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS and employs cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR requirements. However, explicit security headers are not evident in the analyzed content, and the jQuery version used is outdated, which could pose security risks. There is no publicly available security policy or incident response contact information, and no vulnerability disclosure program is detected. Overall, the website is legitimate and professionally maintained, with strong privacy compliance and business credibility. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain registration analysis, but the business presence and content quality support a high trust level. Strategic improvements in security headers, updated libraries, and published security policies would enhance the security posture and trustworthiness further.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ignitis.lt

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
50
Email security
85
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Ignitis holds a dominant position in Lithuania's energy sector as the largest supplier of electricity and gas. Its competitive advantage lies in its extensive customer base and comprehensive energy service offerings. The company targets both residential and commercial segments, leveraging digital channels for customer engagement and service delivery. Revenue streams primarily derive from energy sales and value-added energy solutions. The partnership ecosystem includes major technology and marketing service providers, enhancing digital marketing and analytics capabilities. Growth indicators include a strong digital presence and adoption of smart energy solutions. Operationally, Ignitis demonstrates a mature business model with a focus on compliance and customer experience.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate to good security maturity level with enforced HTTPS and GDPR-aligned cookie consent. Key strengths include the use of CSRF protection cookies and reputable third-party services for analytics and customer support. However, the use of an outdated jQuery version and lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represent potential vulnerabilities. The absence of a published security policy, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure program indicates gaps in transparency and readiness. Compliance with GDPR is evident, but further enhancements in security best practices and public communication of security measures are recommended to strengthen the security culture and incident preparedness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Upgrade jQuery and other JavaScript libraries to the latest secure versions to reduce exposure to known vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website to improve transparency and user trust.
  4. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Regularly audit third-party integrations and tracking tools to ensure compliance with privacy regulations and minimize data exposure risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
UAB Ignitis
Description
„Ignitis“ yra didžiausias elektros ir dujų tiekėjas Lietuvoje – aptarnaujame daugiau kaip 1,6 mln. vartotojų visoje Lietuvoje. Rinkitės išmanius energetinius sprendimus!
Key services
elektros tiekimas, dujų tiekimas, energetikos paslaugos
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, jQuery 1.8.3, Drupal CMS, Visual Website Optimizer (VWO), LiveChat, MailerLite, Cloudflare (implied by IP and scripts)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • CSRF protection cookie (__RequestVerificationToken)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Gemius, Hotjar, VWO, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Meta Platforms, Inc.
Tracking pixels
Gemius, Hotjar, VWO
Marketing tools
Cookiebot, MailerLite, Qualaroo, Smartlook, OneSignal
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no WAF or blocking detected
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy policy present in Lithuanian
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the analyzed HTML snippet
  4. Use of multiple reputable third-party services for analytics, marketing, and customer support
  5. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain registration analysis
  6. Website uses Drupal CMS and includes modern tracking and marketing tools
  7. No visible security policy or incident response information publicly available
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal CMS and integrates multiple third-party technologies including Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, LiveChat, MailerLite, and various analytics platforms such as Hotjar and Gemius. The site uses asynchronous script loading and deferred JavaScript to optimize performance. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design and viewport meta tags. SEO is supported by appropriate meta descriptions, keywords, and Open Graph tags. However, the use of an older jQuery version and lack of explicit security headers suggest areas for modernization. Hosting details are not explicitly identified, but IP and script sources imply use of Cloudflare or similar CDN services. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and functional website with room for security and performance enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ignitis.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ignitis.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.