Skip to main content

Security report for igepa.be

Igepa · Retail · Belgium

Medium risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Igepa is a well-established Belgian company specializing in the distribution of paper, visual communication materials, packaging, and construction products. The company serves a diverse range of professional sectors including copy centers, office supplies, education, cleaning, advertising agencies, and government entities. With a domain registered since 2002, Igepa demonstrates a stable market presence and a broad product offering tailored to B2B customers. The website reflects a professional business model focused on providing comprehensive product categories to its target audience. Technically, the website is built on the Shopware CMS platform and integrates modern tools such as Google Tag Manager for analytics and MultiSafepay for payment processing. The site shows good mobile optimization and moderate performance, although SEO metadata is incomplete and accessibility features are basic. The presence of a cookie consent mechanism indicates some attention to privacy compliance, but the absence of explicit privacy and cookie policies suggests room for improvement. From a security perspective, the website uses HTTPS with a good SSL configuration and employs Google Tag Manager's consent mode. However, no security headers were detected, and no explicit security or incident response policies are published. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could benefit from enhanced transparency and additional protective measures. The overall risk assessment indicates a legitimate and professional business with moderate technical and security maturity. Strategic recommendations include publishing comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, implementing security headers, enhancing SEO and accessibility, and providing clear contact and incident response information to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching igepa.be

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
60
Email security
65
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Igepa operates as a significant player in the retail and manufacturing sectors related to paper and packaging supplies in Belgium. Its business model is primarily B2B, targeting professional sectors requiring specialized materials for visual communication, packaging, and construction. The company leverages a broad product catalog and sector segmentation to address diverse customer needs. The domain age and registration details support a stable market presence. The integration of payment and analytics services indicates a mature e-commerce infrastructure. However, the lack of visible certifications or trust badges and limited contact information may impact customer confidence. Growth opportunities could include expanding digital transparency and enhancing customer engagement through clearer policies and communication channels.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS enabled and the use of Google Tag Manager's consent mode for privacy management. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security robustness. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published, which may hinder effective vulnerability management and breach response. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The site would benefit from implementing comprehensive security best practices, including publishing security policies, adding security headers, and conducting regular security audits to mitigate risks and enhance compliance with GDPR and other regulations.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy accessible from the homepage.
  2. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Add explicit contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer support and incident response.
  4. Complete SEO metadata with descriptive titles and descriptions to improve search engine visibility.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet WCAG standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Igepa
Description
Igepa is a company specializing in paper, visual communication, packaging, and construction materials. It serves various sectors including copy centers, service sectors, office supplies, education, cleaning, advertising agencies, construction, funeral services, visual communication, print, government, and packaging.
Key services
Paper supply, Visual communication materials, Packaging solutions, Construction materials
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, MultiSafepay SDK, ApexCharts
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Google Tag Manager with consent mode
  • Cookie consent mechanism enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
MultiSafepay
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the homepage or main navigation.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is enabled by default.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
  5. The website uses Shopware CMS and integrates Google Tag Manager and MultiSafepay payment SDK.
  6. The site targets B2B sectors with a broad product catalog in paper, packaging, and visual communication.
  7. SEO metadata is incomplete with empty title and description tags.
  8. No security headers detected in the provided data; SSL is enabled.
  9. No social media links or company contact information explicitly found in the snippet.
  10. The site has moderate performance and good mobile optimization.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Shopware CMS platform, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries such as ApexCharts for data visualization and integrating Google Tag Manager for analytics and MultiSafepay for payment processing. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design elements and includes a cookie consent mechanism. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. However, SEO metadata is incomplete, and accessibility features are basic. No advanced frameworks beyond Shopware were detected. Hosting provider details are not explicit in the provided data. The technical infrastructure supports a functional e-commerce experience but could be improved with enhanced SEO, accessibility, and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with igepa.be. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review igepa.be.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.