Skip to main content

Security report for igamingcentre.com

iGaming Centre · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

iGaming Centre operates as a specialized B2B media and directory platform serving the iGaming industry. It provides industry news, supplier listings, event coverage, and recruitment information targeted at professionals and companies within the iGaming sector. The website positions itself as a trusted partner and guide, focusing on delivering relevant content and industry insights. Technically, the site uses a modern frontend stack including Bootstrap, jQuery, and Font Awesome, and is served securely over HTTPS with Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site is mobile optimized with good navigation and content relevance, though accessibility features are basic. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and no visible vulnerabilities, but lacks some security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies or consent mechanisms. Contact information is limited to a company email address visible in event metadata and footer. Overall, the site is professional and functional but could improve transparency and compliance aspects.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of igamingcentre.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching igamingcentre.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
60
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention igamingcentre.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for igamingcentre.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Brand lookalikes

Add-on

Domains that imitate igamingcentre.com and could be used for phishing or spoofed email, tracked in OffSeq Breach.

Tracked
7
Registered
7
Resolving
7
High or critical
0

Last checked 2026-06-19

Masked preview

  • ig••••••••.tre.comLowsubdomain
  • ig•••••••.ntre.comLowsubdomain
  • ga••••••••••.comLowomission

See the full lookalike list

A one-off add-on that lists up to 20 of the highest-risk lookalikes of igamingcentre.com with registration, mail-server, certificate and DNS signals.

Select it in the checkout above.

Lookalike data refreshes continuously. Monitoring on Breach alerts you when a variant is registered, gains a mail server or starts serving HTTPS.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website targets a niche market of iGaming industry professionals, suppliers, and operators, offering a media platform and directory services. Its business model revolves around content publishing, event promotion, and supplier listings, likely monetized through advertising or partnerships. The company appears small with consistent branding and good content quality. The lack of detailed company information and public registrant data suggests a focus on content rather than corporate transparency. The partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed, and no related or subsidiary domains were identified. Growth indicators include active event coverage and recent posts. The platform serves as an industry resource rather than a direct service provider.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enforced and no obvious exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate certain attack vectors. There is no published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure program, which limits transparency and preparedness. Privacy compliance is insufficient, with no cookie consent mechanism or privacy policy detected, potentially exposing the site to GDPR compliance risks. The site does not collect personal data via forms on the homepage, reducing immediate risk. Overall, security practices are adequate but could be significantly improved with policy publication and header implementation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Implement a cookie consent mechanism to inform users and obtain consent for tracking.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection.
  4. Create and publish an incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve transparency and security culture.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve inclusivity and SEO benefits.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
iGaming Centre
Description
iGaming Centre is a B2B directory and media platform for the iGaming industry providing suppliers, interviews, events, vacancies, and industry news. It acts as a trusted partner and guide within the iGaming sector.
Key services
Industry news articles, Supplier directory, Event listings and coverage, Vacancies and recruitment, Interviews and insights
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Font Awesome, Google Fonts, jQuery Toast Plugin
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the homepage or footer.
  3. Contact information limited to email addresses visible in event author metadata and footer; no phone numbers or physical addresses found.
  4. No security or incident response policies published.
  5. Website uses HTTPS and modern frontend libraries but lacks some security headers.
  6. Content is relevant and professionally presented with clear navigation and event listings.
  7. No forms for user registration or contact found on the homepage; search form present but no personal data collection fields.
  8. No social media links explicitly found in the provided HTML.
  9. Google Tag Manager used for analytics and tracking.
  10. No visible certifications or compliance badges.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern frontend technology stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for DOM manipulation, and Font Awesome for icons. Google Fonts are used for typography. Analytics are implemented via Google Tag Manager. The site is served over HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. Performance appears moderate with no obvious blocking scripts or heavy resources. The site lacks a known CMS, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility is basic, with room for improvement. No broken links or errors were detected in the provided content. Hosting provider details are not disclosed.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 68/100 +9Medium33 findingsView report
  2. 59/100 −7Medium36 findingsView report
  3. 66/100Medium25 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with igamingcentre.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review igamingcentre.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.